What I find baffling is this. We have these right wing politicians like Trump claiming only he can deal with islamic extremism in his way. Newspapers like The Sun fuels the sentiment and exaggerate the problem, as like I said terrorism has affected under 20 people since 2010.
Now i'm not saying that doesn't make it a problem to address but Trump on the one hand is going to make the western world safer by dealing with islam then at the same time pulling the US out of climate treaties etc and threatening our entire way of life to support the coal/oil companies. Again these are part of the reason we now have to deal with islamic extremism but everyone eats it up anyway.
I doubt they do, but it's not necessary either. It has been established that certain classes of convicts (like child molesters and traitors) have to be kept separately for their own protection as the "honest" crooks can't stand them. Now anyone on a killing spree is Central London has a fairly good shot at the same treatment, I should think.
I know its easier and simpler to get mad at this but I was trying to give you some wider context. I would also disagree this is purely about religion. Like it was with the IRA religion is a justification, the political instability in the middle east is the main driver behind islamic terrorism.
True, but that's another discussion. The point I was trying to make was how the far right people are gonna go fucking bananas over this just because a muslim did it, but when people are shot every day by white people with no special agenda, that earns a casual shrug.
When people are committing terrorism in the name of Islam, then it is about religion. The IRA comparison fails, as evidenced by some of their senior members not being religious and them not fighting for the Papacy.
And once more, how do Pakistanis and Jamaican Muslims relate to the Middle East? Neither Jamaica nor Pakistan are in the Middle East, the only way it makes sense for them to be involved is if it is about...drumroll...religion.
I understand. But the same thing happens with the far left when a person dies from gun violence, they go bananas over it, yet they do not say much when a family in a car are killed in a crash. There is hypocrisy on both sides. The issue is not what race/nationality a person is or what item they used, but the person's motives. In this case he used a knife, which I understand in Britain, like in the US, have some strict laws on the carry of knives. Here in Ohio, they are stricter on knife laws than they are on guns. :P