Whoa there cowboy.
You have forgotten a lot of steps.
- iSword rumor mill.
- iSword leaked photos.
- Months and months of iSword fanboy debates online vs. "sword" fanboys.
- iSword pre-press announcement.
- iSword developers conference announcement.
- 20 minutes of story telling of the iSword development.
- Theatrical iSword screen presentation.
- Unveiling of the cardboard iSword.
- Frantic pre-orders of the $900 iSword crash the website.
- iSword demand cannot be met, 6-8 weeks before pre-orders are shipped. Corrugated paper in short supply.
- Initial iSword shipments end up in consumer hands with defective pommels. Further problems are discovered with the Cross Guard and Rain Guards on the first 1,000,000 shipped.
- iSword 1.1 is shipped correcting the initial 1.0 manufacturing shortcomings. Ginsu technology added to improve PR and to entice people to refurbish iSword 1.0's to prevent them from becoming collector's items.
I mean come on, you're forgetting a lot of steps here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szabla
There's a reason THIS, and not katana, spread to pretty much all armies around the world. Well, 2 reasons, one being the European dominance that influenced armies around the world.
The reason being that katana is a good weapon only in the eyes of weaboos that watched 1 shounen anime too many. Actual soldiers would never, ever fight using a katana unless they didn't have a choice. Hell, even for samurai themselves katana was exactly the last weapon of choice. And as far as actual Japanese go, I encourage you to watch some 19th and early 20th century pictures and drawings and see what weapons Japanese officers (most of which descended from samurai) carry...
I mean, sure, katana is a good weapon if you're a super-invincible-hand-regenerating Shadow Ninja of Doom of 4th Step of 6th Circle of the Darkest Hell, but that's about the only case you could appreciate it.
It's absolutely the case, as you said, because of armor. Maybe "crushing" is the wrong word. "Concussive" may be the better word in that case.
Against unarmored targets, it still doesn't matter if it's sharp, just that it works to physically amplify pressure. That's math.
Edit: If you had to cut down a large oak tree, would you rather have a razor sharp katana or a dull european longsword?
A sword that shot small projectiles. :P
As some folks have mentioned, modern technology doesn't really advance swords outside of improved quality metals. Sword design changed not necessarily because our "tech" improved over time but because circumstances warranted it. The best sword against heavy armor is not necessarily the best sword against a lightly armored person. Heavy 2handed swords are very awesome against metal armor but they're very unwieldy and not realistic in close quarters, or if you need the ability to use your hands for other things or want to use them as a tool for doing other things. A quick slashing sword is portable and precise but isn't going to be able to deal with armor. A thrusting sword can go well between armor sections, but is useless if you need to actually cut or slash rather than stab. In martial arts training, my favourite blade is a bolo for weight and size but it's not a perfect weapon. That's because there is no such thing as a perfect sword (despite what katana fanboys will tell you), only the best tool for that particular set of circumstances.
So ultimately my answer is that what I would use is not technology to pick the perfect sword but the knowledge of martial history to take the best concepts used in similar circumstances to make a blade that would be most relevant to me in that time and place.
And also high quality steel
It'd be irrelevant, since the edge would be ruined long before you came anywhere close to cutting the tree down.
And yeah, to modern noncombatants like most of us, getting hit with a dull longsword would hurt, but then again getting hit with any solid metal object would hurt. If you wanted an actual weapon for clubbing someone to death, you'd want all the weight near the end, not by the handle.
A gun that shot out other guns, duh.
"It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum... and I'm all outta ass."
I'm a British gay Muslim Pakistani American citizen, ask me how that works! (terribly)
How's that irrelevant? In the case of armor, a longsword is great weapon.
It can fucking amputate you with a good swing. That's math. I vowed once to never epeen in fighting threads. I guess I have to extend that to sword threads. (On that note, I wouldn't take my longsword to a rapier fight.)
- - - Updated - - -
Math. Pressure = force/area. Doesn't take much to cut off a wrist or ankle.
I'd take a sword and put a double-edged axehead on top. It's impractical as fuck and a normal axe could probably do the job but it doesn't look as cool!
As a serious answer I would take some form of Poleweapon and a small sword as a sidearm.
Material would be different kinds of steel depending on the part and some wood for the Hilt. If the Material is too different from the standards with it's supposed amazing performance it will get stolen. If you weapon ha a black edge or something like that it would only draw unwanted attention.
PS: A gun would be useless unless you could manufacture ammunition. Even then, something like that WILL get taken from you.
Last edited by mmocdfca36c20d; 2017-03-30 at 07:21 AM.
i would get a long piece of metal and sharpen it a lot
If you are particularly bold, you could use a Shiny Ditto. Do keep in mind though, this will infuriate your opponents due to Ditto's beauty. Please do not use Shiny Ditto. You have been warned.
A wooden sword with a mounted slingshot on it.
Just a big ass chunk of metal with an edge. Needs to be easily repairable, because actually using it will cause nicks and dents - no matter the material.
Alternatively it might be interesting to have parts of the edge modular so that you can replace them easily, but that would certainly be a design challenge.