We started to care when there was a large chance that a corrupt cunt like Clinton was possibly going to be controlling a major Ally and World Superpower.
- - - Updated - - -
Doesn't matter if they are criticized when they just do it regardless.
We started to care when there was a large chance that a corrupt cunt like Clinton was possibly going to be controlling a major Ally and World Superpower.
- - - Updated - - -
Doesn't matter if they are criticized when they just do it regardless.
For the sake of history please furnish the proof, not conjectures. We know during WWI Germany attempted to arm Mexico because the diplomat who came up with the idea, Zimmerman, after which the infamous Zimmerman Telegram is named, admitted it when confronted by the press (in addition to the telegram being intercepted by Britain). Why he didn't go and categorically deny it is a mystery.
Not seen a single shred of evidence to prove Russia 'hacked' the election. Maybe they did, but until irrefutable proof (in the manner of cosmic background radiation proving the Big Bang kind of proof) exists, it will always be conjecture.
Funny thing about human nature, when one side loses, they will always find something or someone else to blame other than reflecting upon themselves to ask the obvious.
Last edited by JohnBrown1917; 2017-03-31 at 12:58 AM.
Lot of Russian "whataboutism" in this thread, a common tactic for Russian posters. It's about Russia using the internet and other means to actively manipulate an election in France, just like the Russians manipulated the election in the US.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
So, basically it's whataboutism to point out that country A is only doing something all the other major countries do? If so doesn't that actually imply that what their doing isn't a big deal lol.
It's like:
Hubcap: OMG Russians eat meat!!!
Forum: Most people in every country eat meat...
Hubcap: Whataboutism! your argument is irrelevant! Russia bad!
False. There is 11 candidates. 5 big names. He already rules out seven of them 30 days before the first round.
He wants to educated the world about stuff but he should educate him self before talking. Or maybe he know things we dont know yet and accuse Russia for stuff he's already doing.....
Yay more anti-Russian garbage news. How about this present the evidence, you know not just some guy says he's seen proof. Anyway are the Americans really allowed to talk about other countries interfering, seems a bit hypocritical.
I just think if your going to blame someone provide proof not just promise you have proof. That goes for any country talking about any other, believing news on what a politician says they know to be true is foolish in the extreme. So before another round of blame the Russians kicks off how about this time they actual give evidence and not just whip up a scare story which ends up having some elements of truth but was nowhere near as big as they built it up to be.