This is probably win-win for Labour in all honesty. Either Corbyn wins the election, or Labour get a new leader. Either scenario works for them.
This is probably win-win for Labour in all honesty. Either Corbyn wins the election, or Labour get a new leader. Either scenario works for them.
If the UK overwhelmingly votes for Theresa May and Tory austerity, as every indication shows they are likely to do, then they deserve to suffer the economic pain of austerity, having their jobs destroyed, public services decimated while letting the rich off with more tax cuts.
Let the economic decline begin. No sympathy.
My sentiments exactly.
A snap election now provides May with a democratic mandate for her leadership and gives her the authority to lead the UK in its departure from the EU.
Plus, it forces Labour to take a long, hard look in the mirror and realise how completely irrelevant they have become with Corbyn at their head. If they had any sense, they would appoint Kate Hoey as leader of the opposition, an Labour MP who supported Brexit, something she could hold over previously Remainer Theresa May. It would probably win Labour back some working-class confidence as well for Labour to have a Brexiteer as their leader.
I would suggest that you educate yourself, if you think it was Labour that fucked the banks. It was the banks that fucked the banks, by being excessively capitalist. They got greedy, did the kind of stupid things that greedy people do when they are chasing money and didn't realise that it could all go wrong until it did. The only thing that Labour did was to step in and stop the whole thing collapsing, which it came damn close to doing.
Still, at least the Tories have stepped in during the 7 years they have been in power and sorted out the financial situation, haven't they? After all, they were elected in 2010 promising that they would have it all taken care of by 2015. Except they didn't, their solutions haven't worked and in the meantime they have borrowed more money than every Labour government in history combined.
Still, I'm sure the Tories have put in place controls that insure that this sort of banking problem couldn't happen again? What, you mean they haven't? But I keep hearing that the Tories are the party of economic responsibility, that they are the party we can trust to run things properly. Are you telling me that despite the great crash being so recent in our experiences, that they haven't even done anything about stopping it from happening again?
It's almost as if the party was funded by the banks, and run for their personal benefit, isn't it?
When challenging a Kzin, a simple scream of rage is sufficient. You scream and you leap.
Originally Posted by George CarlinOriginally Posted by Douglas Adams
RIP Jeremy Corbyn
The UK had NOTHING to do with the Greece, Spain bailouts. That was done by Eurozone countries of which the UK is not a member and contributed nothing. Get your facts right, dumbass.
And no, Labour did not "fuck the banks". Bank deregulation enabled the banks to bet on toxic derivatives that went bad when the US housing bubble burst, causing the global financial crisis. The Conservatives wanted to deregulate the banks even further before the crisis, i.e. make the global financial crisis worse.
Last edited by paralleluniverse; 2017-04-18 at 12:17 PM.
You love the word greed don't you. You know what, you've convinced me. Let's get rid of money, let's kill the rich and all live happily ever after. Let's take magic mushrooms and dance around the campfire in grass skirts.
Stopped reading when you insulted me. Socialists are just terrible at rational debate aren't they?
Corbyn is stepping down
"Would you please let me join your p-p-party?
What the alternative? A fractured Labour? Lib Dem (can't even say that with a straight face).
A big part of the problem here is that the Political system doesnt have something that represents the modern middle / working class people. Labour are more about equal rights than they are about solving actual problems. Lib dems proved they cant be trusted after the student fee incident, meaning the only options were either UKIP (the racist homophobes) or Tory.
I actually find it hillarious that people insult Corbyn when he is the only current member of the labor party who has the values in line with the ORIGINAL meaning of the labor party of the early 1900's.
Last edited by mmoc96304d6c53; 2017-04-18 at 11:50 AM.
Oh look, right-wing snowflake can't handle the fact that I pointed out he's a bullshitter. He can't defend his indefensible lie, because it's not true, instead he resorts to tone policing!
This is a lie: " The reason GB had to bail out Greece, Spain et al is because we were forced to, gun against temple, by the Union to which we will no longer belong."
You should apologize for misleading readers with your lie.
The UK helped bailout both Ireland and Portugal, we struck a deal to make sure we did not have to help with Greece and Spain directly. However we did contribute €4.5bn to the IMF that helped with the bailouts of Greece and Spain.
We also helped Ireland out separately, though that was of our own accord.
Rational debate would take place with someone with knowledge of the subject at hand, or a willingness to learn. You have taken up your position that socialism is an evil thing, and when your ignorance is flagged up to you your response is to overreact (your response to me) or feign hurt (your response to Paralleluniverse).
If you want to debate, then admit that your earlier points were based on false information, and adjust your viewpoint accordingly. Because if you don't, then clearly you aren't after debate, you just want someone to tell you that you're right. There are right-wing echo chambers that are more likely to provide that for you, perhaps you would do better in such a "safe space"?
When challenging a Kzin, a simple scream of rage is sufficient. You scream and you leap.
Originally Posted by George CarlinOriginally Posted by Douglas Adams
@Kalis any chance I can convince you to vote yellow?