The invasion is irrelevant as the invasion isn't what gave Crimeans their independence. It is the referendum.
Actually, whether or not it was unjust for the Ukrainian people is irrelevant. The injustice in question here refers to America doing the same thing without repercussions, whereas Russia got punished severely. Try again though.
- - - Updated - - -
I'm "upset" that Russia gets punished for doing the same thing America did that America had no consequences for.
Saying there are differences in principle is not the same as proving it. You can try to prove it, but you will fail.
The only difference you mentioned is Russia annexing Crimea. They did it by allowing Crimeans do choose. This is the "principle".
- - - Updated - - -
I bet you just couldn't understand version 1.0 of him because you were used to the beta version, which is a few levels behind. Now I don't expect you to understand version 2.0 (me) either. But practice makes perfect, so keep working hard and you'll get the point!
- - - Updated - - -
It is irrelevant because the invasion isn't what created the independence. It only secured the existence of the referendum. But if a referendum is okay (ala Kosovo), then troops securing that it takes place is okay too.
Keep trying.
It's kind of ridiculous that people can't adhere to what the OP requested: non-significant differences. Examples of what would be appropriate:
1. Both the US and Russia are world powers; granted, plenty of people would argue Russia isn't much of a power anymore.
2. Kosovo and Crimea are both in Europe.
Feel free to come up with your own relevant talking that adhere to level of discussion that the OP is requesting.
- - - Updated - - -
Why would I need to try? And how have I failed? You have proven my point several times in this thread. Fuck dude, you make it easy Again, TY sir!
You're slipping, I never said that. Slow down, take a deep breath, and try again. Cracks are showing. Recoup before they get deeper and wider.
How has nobody mentioned Cechnya, I feel like that is the more relevant example. "We are recognizing the people's will" as long as their will is to be under Russia. Also stuff like Prague spring makes it hard to give Russia the benefit of the doubt. Every one is entitled to their own opinion, but its strange to me that some one from a former warsaw pact country would defend Russia. And this is not ancient history, my mom was alive when the tanks came into Slovakia.
Signature deleted due to it violating the rules. Please read the signature rules for more info.
Really? Then you've been more useless to the thread than I initially thought.
How's that cognitive dissonance progressing?
- - - Updated - - -
Why has nobody mentioned blacks and native Americans? I really wonder why after years of oppression and arguably even today if it is true that blacks get judicial and other forms of systemic discrimination, that they cannot have their own sovereign territory.
Nobody is saying Russia is good here, but that it isn't doing anything different in principle to what America is doing.
Nice try though!
Russia didn't just recognise an idependent Crimea. They invaded with military force after bombarding the populaion with the exact same type of propaganda about Nazis etc. that they have done in places like Georgia and Lithuania. Then they held a dubious referendum results while the place was still occupied. Were there mass protests or any major movement from within Crimea calling for Crimean population calling to secede and join Russia ? No...
Russia has form for this type of thing. Look at the case of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia... They will do the same in the Baltic countries if they can find a way. They are already pumping the same propaganda into those regions and they've even sent in Russian Nazi provocateurs posing as locals to try and stir things up.
btw if you really want an answer to you question there are literally hundreds of major articles pointing out why it's not the same if you google "difference between kosovo and crimea".
Last edited by Paulosio; 2017-04-21 at 01:07 AM.
America also invaded Serbia and bombed them, and sent "peacekeeping" troops to Kosovo. They then supported the Kosovo government in their efforts to make a referendum, and recognized the results.
The differences here are extremely minor. Nobody is saying there is no difference at all in terms of how it came to happen, but that is laughable to suggest being important. What is important is that both America and Russia recognized referendums that violated the sovereignty of other states. No less, no more. Russia only took a step further and recognized Crimea as its own state, but again - because the people there VOTED for it.
Oh my mistake, I just assumed because they were communist they were behind the iron curtain. And in reference to all the messed up stuff the US has done, yeah its 100% true. Slavery and the genocide of native Americans is appalling. And I disagree with some of the meddling USA does abroad too, for example I don't understand why we have to be so adversarial with Iran an alliance with them is way more appealing to me with one with Saudi Arabia. In reference to the blacks being discriminated against... I have lived in eastern and northern europe (very young on the northern one), and yeah there is definitely systemic racism but I still stand by my opinion that Europe on average is more racist than the US. I would love to hear opinions from people that have lived in both though.
Signature deleted due to it violating the rules. Please read the signature rules for more info.
They are de facto puppet states. America has the money, the power and the agents to influence many countries to do what America wants.
- - - Updated - - -
You had no point. You only showcased cognitive dissonance, which I love observing! Continue kindly!