A) The New York Times at least got you to pretend to care about African women. That's a success of a sort.
B) This probably hasn't been the best month to take your feminist cues from Fox News. Just sayin'.
A) The New York Times at least got you to pretend to care about African women. That's a success of a sort.
B) This probably hasn't been the best month to take your feminist cues from Fox News. Just sayin'.
How to tell if somebody learned World Geography in school or from SNL:
"GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?
PALIN: They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska."
SNL: Can't be Diomede Islands, say her backyard instead.
Makes me wonder how many Muslim employees/investors they have, I'm sure the usual suspects of CAIR and such are putting pressure on them but some of this has to come from in house.
The Fresh Prince of Baudelaire
Banned at least 10 times. Don't give a fuck, going to keep saying what I want how I want to.
Eat meat. Drink water. Do cardio and burpees. The good life.
And do you know why people will start about male circumcision? And why do we not call male circumcision mgm? You know, as it is still mutilation!?
For someone telling someone else to "read up" you sure as hell do not have allot of knowledge of the subject. Firstly, if you take the worst case of MGM and the worst case of FGM then the severity of the MGM is worse. Because, yes, cutting something of entirely (the whole phallus) trumps sewing something shut. This isn't to say that girls do not have it bad because of this, they do, but this isn't something that only happens to females.I think you should read up on FGM. Not that I in any way approve of male circumcision but the girls do have it worse.
Secondly, if you where to put the two least invasive forms of the MGM and FGM next to each other then the male one will be worse yet again. As the pin prick (Jewish custom) is nowhere as severe as circumcision is, yet it is still illegal.
I didn't made this post to have a "who has it worse" competition, im merely trying to point out how depraved the situation actually is. While we find it not okay to preform any form of MGM, even when it is comparable to the male circumcision version. Yet in America it is no problem to cut up baby boys because "muh religion". At the same time in African mothers are doing this FGM to their daughters for the freaking same reason as MGM is done to boys in America, "its not that bad, i have it too" "but, insert bogus medical reason" "the other sex thinks it looks pretty".
Cutting up babies is medieval and should not happen, period. It should not matter what sex it is before it is considered to be "a bad thing".
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
You should learn to read, the worst case of MGM (that includes circumcision, but this isn't the only form of MGM) is worse then the FGM version. I do not mean a surgery gone wrong, i mean cutting of the phallus because that is exactly what they wanted to do. And that is worse then sewing a girl shut while cutting of some parts. Luckily this doesn't happen allot, but it does happen.
The point is that with the whole MGM vs FMG discussion is dishonest. If you want to compare MGM to FGM then you have to compare versions that are alike. What is happening here is comparing the least worst version of MGM with the worst version of FGM.
It's ILLEGAL in civilized countries and no one cares what camel-herders do in the desert, so there's no point to even bring it up. We are not comparing what CAN be done to ones genitalia. The ACCEPTABLE practices of FGM (clitoris removal) are FAR worse than acceptable practices of MGM (foreskin removal).
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
Now you should read the OP. The horrible FGM that is still practiced in CIVILIZED world, albeit recently made illegal, is a problematic term for PC crowd and they want to soften it to be like "male circumcision" which is not illegal. And the intricate nuances of male circumcision legality are irrelevant in this topic.
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
There isn't a civilized place where they cut up baby girls, unless you want to include the same people you excluded in your last post, but i wouldnt call that the civilized world.
Those places you speak of are the same places that also still practice slavery to some degree or another and still practise the horrible forms of MGM too.
The fact that you think that male circumcisions legality doesn't enter into this discussion is laughable, you can not condone one without having to condone the other. Well of course you can but it would make you a very big hypocrite. Cutting up babies is bad, no matter what gender they are.
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
No, you should.
No, its not punishable by law, that would imply that its not a civil matter.The worst case FGM is not sewing anything, it's "phallus" removal and it isn't even considered a bad thing unlike MGM, if you cut a phallus during male circumcision - it's malpractice punishable by law