This remark would have more weight to it if you weren't regurgitating straw (you know, starting with the previous sentence of this paragraph, because @Zulkhan said jack shit about greatness; if you can't spot the difference between "development" and "greatness", buy new eyes or pull the straw out of your current ones) all over the thread whenever you've got no sensible reply to a point that's contrary to yours. Just saying. I have to go out right now, will get through the rest of your nonsense after I come back.
OK, gonna indulge a bit more. Says the person constantly whining about events revolving around Sylvanas that are even older than this. Even better, whining that includes the quality of the story. Like, for example, how there was supposedly no quality at all because Forsaken joined the Horde (in which you cherrypick the reasons for that alliance down to the one that's convenient to said whining of yours). It's been almost 13 years, give it a break already
EDIT: Since I'm back, gonna cover the rest of your nonsense.
Way to ignore the other aspects surrounding his death like, I dunno, the closure that Zulkhan mentioned, just so you could cherry-pick the circumstances of his killing blow alone.
There's a difference between being useless in-story because the character is simply bad at their job and between being useless from the perspective of commentary on the story, because the character receives no development. Character development is the cornerstone of a character's story. And characters' stories are the cornerstone of the overall story because a story should be first and foremost character-driven. And in case of Vol'jin there wasn't the barest character development. The fact that you're pretending to be some guru of good storytelling when faced with no character development and non-character-driven story is outright laughable.
Look at all of the times he focused on your comparison of Vol'jin and Varian. Wait... Now, if one wasn't busy choking on straw, they'd perhaps have noticed that the point of contention was you calling Vol'jin to not be a military leader and someone bad at combat in general. Which, you know, is abject horseshit. So you either didn't read Shadows of the Horde, you read it but couldn't understand it for shit for some reason, or you were too busy playing with straw while reading it to actually register it in your memory.
Meaningful reign. Meaningful story. Spot the difference.
Yes, because there's no way people could just voice that opinion without interacting with the "rabid Troll fanboy" that is Zulkhan /s And if you dropped the victim complex, you'd have noticed that: 1) no one prevents you from voicing your opinions, 2) people aren't criticizing your opinions because of you being in the silent majority but because you're constantly peddling headcanon and some weird-ass nonsense like universal values or total misrepresentation of writing quality. Oh, and 3) the total irony of you, a person repeating the same trite lies about "muh Sylvanas" that have been voiced by the Sylvanas Salt Squad for a decade over and over and over again, complaining about a vocal minority ranting about anything.
Dun dun dunnnn.
3complicated7me Which is evidenced by them not even attempting to board the straw train to dismiss it somehow and instead just outright ignoring this bit.
The best part is that you voiced that very sentiment in that threat prior to that poster's "contribution".
Hururur how dare someone post an opinion different to the opinion of the vocal minority within the fanbase that repeats the same rant a thousand times over durrrr.
Well, there's always Blizzard sycophancy.
See, it all fits together.