It would be perfectly legal for him in many countries to go for 15 year olds.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Asia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Africa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_o..._South_America
And there you go again. Can't see the difference between "finding attractive" and "wanting to have sex".
I find some teens attractive too. Normal animal insticts stuff - healthy, young females, perfect for proliferating. Sure.
But the moment I started wanting (and I don't) to have sex with them I become sick. Not just feeling attraction, but looking for ways to make it happen, or being ready to do it had the occasion occur. That's breaking important social rules / boundaries.
I have enough of EA ruining great franchises and studios, forcing DRM and Origin on their games, releasing incomplete games only to sell day-1 DLCs or spill dozens of DLCs, and then saying it, and microtransactions, is what players want, stopping players from giving EA games poor reviews, as well as deflecting complaints with cheap PR tricks.
I'm not going to buy any game by EA as long as they continue those practices.
Doesn't matter. What matters is the social rules where you live. To which you have to submit. If you don't then you better get out or get ready to be branded as a sicko.
People are not animals. We may have have animal instincts, but we also have our morality and social rules, which may differ between regions. And we are judged according to those rules.
I have enough of EA ruining great franchises and studios, forcing DRM and Origin on their games, releasing incomplete games only to sell day-1 DLCs or spill dozens of DLCs, and then saying it, and microtransactions, is what players want, stopping players from giving EA games poor reviews, as well as deflecting complaints with cheap PR tricks.
I'm not going to buy any game by EA as long as they continue those practices.
Right, but it points out that this isn't some universal moral law that banging 15-year olds isn't just illegal, but obviously immoral and "disgusting". It's illegal here because we have to draw a line somewhere and roughly 16, 17, or 18 seems about right, but this isn't some standard human moral intuition. Drawing a line and enforcing it harshly is a good idea, but let's be clear, this is basically a technicality.
People who break the laws are generally not in need of any treatment, especially so when there's no manifestation of a mental illness. They know what's legal and illegal, they just don't care or they think the risk is worth it. They're not some retarded kid who don't know any better.
Yeah, and this is where I disagree - I really doubt he wasn't clear on the matter that banging 15-year olds is off limits. The term "jailbait" exists for a reason. Stick your hand in the cookie jar, get an asswhooping and a few years of probation and a ton of community service sounds about right.
So I guess I do agree that locking him up isn't really the answer, but that's because I think the crime here is pretty weak tea. He's not mentally ill, he's just a douche that's willing to violate laws and social norms to try to get his dick sucked. Put him on probation and if he does it again, throw him in jail.
I have enough of EA ruining great franchises and studios, forcing DRM and Origin on their games, releasing incomplete games only to sell day-1 DLCs or spill dozens of DLCs, and then saying it, and microtransactions, is what players want, stopping players from giving EA games poor reviews, as well as deflecting complaints with cheap PR tricks.
I'm not going to buy any game by EA as long as they continue those practices.
I have enough of EA ruining great franchises and studios, forcing DRM and Origin on their games, releasing incomplete games only to sell day-1 DLCs or spill dozens of DLCs, and then saying it, and microtransactions, is what players want, stopping players from giving EA games poor reviews, as well as deflecting complaints with cheap PR tricks.
I'm not going to buy any game by EA as long as they continue those practices.
Oh but that's how psychology functions. When people with their behaviour cross certain boundries set by the society they are considered sick. Society as a whole decides what's normal and what's not, what the boundries of "normal" psychological behaviour are. Sexoholism or psychopathy may be a normal behaviour based on instinct, but in many countries it's treated as disease which should be treated.
I have enough of EA ruining great franchises and studios, forcing DRM and Origin on their games, releasing incomplete games only to sell day-1 DLCs or spill dozens of DLCs, and then saying it, and microtransactions, is what players want, stopping players from giving EA games poor reviews, as well as deflecting complaints with cheap PR tricks.
I'm not going to buy any game by EA as long as they continue those practices.
Well I wouldn't go as far as calling it taboo -- I mean we have the same shitlords in this thread crying foul about an older man and younger woman who are in full support of the same thing happening had the sexes been reversed. What we have here is the typical double-standard of it being "sick" if its an older man and younger girl...but "Nice!" if it's an older woman and younger man.
“You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X
I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)
That's not how psychology/psychiatry functions. Mental disease is only diagnosed when a behavior out of the norm has a negative effect on a persons ability to function in society due to inhibited cognition, change in mood and so on. It does not apply to people who are fully aware of what they are doing is illegal and accept the risks.
Last edited by Freighter; 2017-07-01 at 06:10 PM.