Page 1 of 2
1
2
LastLast
  1. #1

    Trump Better Than Obama

    At killing civilians

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/preside...ilians-per-day

    6 months in and Trump has nearly matched Obama's 8 year total. Seems like that's one campaign promise Trump was able to keep after all.

    Make America War Criminals Again?
    Last edited by Wyrt; 2017-07-18 at 02:26 AM.

  2. #2
    The 2,300 number from the Obama administration is from US 'air strikes'. The 2,200 is from 'strikes' from all countries.
    We need a number from from just US 'air strikes' to compare the two in real terms.

    Secondly, there has been no change in doctrine in the rules of engagement since the Obama administration. All one has to do is look at the graph in the provided link and see where the lion's share of the casualties are coming from.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    The 2,300 number from the Obama administration is from US 'air strikes'. The 2,200 is from 'strikes' from all countries.
    We need a number from from just US 'air strikes' to compare the two in real terms.

    Secondly, there has been no change in doctrine in the rules of engagement since the Obama administration. All one has to do is look at the graph in the provided link and see where the lion's share of the casualties are coming from.
    I think the change has been that Trump has given control of the strikes to the generals so they happen more often with greater force (MOB). I am not sure about the numbers on the op would have to look that up.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    The 2,300 number from the Obama administration is from US 'air strikes'. The 2,200 is from 'strikes' from all countries.
    We need a number from from just US 'air strikes' to compare the two in real terms.

    Secondly, there has been no change in doctrine in the rules of engagement since the Obama administration. All one has to do is look at the graph in the provided link and see where the lion's share of the casualties are coming from.
    This doesn't seem to be true, with respect to data here:
    https://airwars.org/civilian-casualty-claims/

    Where does your information come from?
    While you live, shine / Have no grief at all / Life exists only for a short while / And time demands its toll.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukh View Post
    This doesn't seem to be true, with respect to data here:
    https://airwars.org/civilian-casualty-claims/

    Where does your information come from?
    The spin piece provided from the OP.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Draco-Onis View Post
    I think the change has been that Trump has given control of the strikes to the generals so they happen more often with greater force (MOB). I am not sure about the numbers on the op would have to look that up.
    Yeah, this is actually a pretty massive change. Trump basically told the military "you guys have the authority to do whatever, don't even worry about telling me." It hasn't worked that way in a very long time. It takes a lot of accountability out of the process - not in the way that Trump can no longer take direct blame for what's done over there (which is also true), but that the military lost an important step for keeping them accountable.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Grapemask View Post
    Yeah, this is actually a pretty massive change. Trump basically told the military "you guys have the authority to do whatever, don't even worry about telling me." It hasn't worked that way in a very long time. It takes a lot of accountability out of the process - not in the way that Trump can no longer take direct blame for what's done over there (which is also true), but that the military lost an important step for keeping them accountable.
    Do you have a source for that? Or are you just making that up?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    Do you have a source for that? Or are you just making that up?
    Probably the fact that when they dropped the Mother of All Bombs, aka the MOAB, Trump didn't even know about it. It was the first time it was ever used in a combat setting.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    Do you have a source for that? Or are you just making that up?
    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=trump+gives+con...es+to+generals

  10. #10
    Seems he did.
    It appears a PotUS is letting the military do their job for a change.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    Seems he did.
    It appears a PotUS is letting the military do their job for a change.
    Military's job is to kill civilians?

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    Seems he did.
    It appears a PotUS is letting the military do their job for a change.
    And, as a result, the OP is correct in that the US has killed almost as many civilians under Trump in 6 months than under Obama in 8 years. Which will likely result in MOAB (Mother of All Blowback).

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Omega10 View Post
    And, as a result, the OP is correct in that the US has killed almost as many civilians under Trump in 6 months than under Obama in 8 years. Which will likely result in MOAB (Mother of All Blowback).
    What are the numbers from 2008 to 2016 confirmed civilians killed by US alone compared to 2017 confirmed civilians killed by US alone?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyrt View Post
    Military's job is to kill civilians?
    I don't know, is it?

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    What are the numbers from 2008 to 2016 confirmed civilians killed by US alone compared to 2017 confirmed civilians killed by US alone?

    - - - Updated - - -



    I don't know, is it?
    Why am I not surprised that Allybeboba is playing fucking semantics with civilian deaths?

  15. #15
    The Patient
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Palatka, Fl, USA
    Posts
    258
    Quote Originally Posted by Orbitus View Post
    Why am I not surprised that Allybeboba is playing fucking semantics with civilian deaths?
    Care to enlighten us as to how asking for solid confirmation of numbers is "playing fucking semantics", sounds more like fact checking.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukh View Post
    This doesn't seem to be true, with respect to data here:
    https://airwars.org/civilian-casualty-claims/

    Where does your information come from?
    It comes from a place that fits his agenda

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Antipathy1018 View Post
    Care to enlighten us as to how asking for solid confirmation of numbers is "playing fucking semantics", sounds more like fact checking.
    No, Allybeboba is the apparently master of pulling the semantics card. It doesn't matter if its confirmed or not, he will do it with everything that is critical of Trump. And then claim not to be supporting Trump.

  18. #18
    The Patient
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Palatka, Fl, USA
    Posts
    258
    Quote Originally Posted by Orbitus View Post
    No, Allybeboba is the apparently master of pulling the semantics card. It doesn't matter if its confirmed or not, he will do it with everything that is critical of Trump. And then claim not to be supporting Trump.
    Well if it is confirmed that he is wrong then he has no leg to stand on and well if he is that hyper partisan well . . . not much anyone can do so don't engage with them. But till that happens why bother, especially using such a flawed argument? It just makes you look as hyper partisan as they are, regardless if that is their past behavior. Hell even a broken clock is right twice a day and all that.

  19. #19
    Legendary! TZucchini's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Wish it was Canada
    Posts
    6,989
    Obama only killed 2,300 civilians during his time in office?

    No way that number is right.
    Eat yo vegetables

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    The spin piece provided from the OP.
    Do you mean you're interpreting the wording a certain way? They data appears to be consistent across comparisons.
    While you live, shine / Have no grief at all / Life exists only for a short while / And time demands its toll.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •