Page 1 of 2
1
2
LastLast
  1. #1

    Semi-big victory for e-cig industry

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.ac367d84fc7b

    The FDA is pulling back the August 2018 deadline, until 2022. I personally consider this a huge victory, for the time being, for the E-cig industry.

    Hopefully, more science with come out showing these products, and devices (properly used) are a lot less dangerous than the cigarette/tobacco alternative.
    No man really becomes a fool until he stops asking questions.

  2. #2
    When I was in vacation earlier this year someone's e-cigarette literally exploded mere feet away from us. It frickin' nuts. I had flashbacks.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KR7_xwQbYp0

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pTehBeQHvHM

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Aft9m2uEXxE

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4D3afTbbwUI

  3. #3
    The Lightbringer Dr Assbandit's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,804
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    When I was in vacation earlier this year someone's e-cigarette literally exploded mere feet away from us. It frickin' nuts. I had flashbacks.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KR7_xwQbYp0

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pTehBeQHvHM

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Aft9m2uEXxE

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4D3afTbbwUI
    It's Gods ways of telling us that vaping is an abomination unto the lord on the same level of sin as vegans and cross-fitters.
    "It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum... and I'm all outta ass."

    I'm a British gay Muslim Pakistani American citizen, ask me how that works! (terribly)

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadoweye View Post
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.ac367d84fc7b

    The FDA is pulling back the August 2018 deadline, until 2022. I personally consider this a huge victory, for the time being, for the E-cig industry.

    Hopefully, more science with come out showing these products, and devices (properly used) are a lot less dangerous than the cigarette/tobacco alternative.
    I think you forget it took us decades worth of scientific data to assess how dangerous cigarettes were. There is no way yet for us to know the effects of long term E-cig use since most people are not using them to quit they are just becoming addicted to them instead.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Assbandit View Post
    It's Gods ways of telling us that vaping is an abomination unto the lord on the same level of sin as vegans and cross-fitters.
    That sucker went off like a rocket in his pocket.

  7. #7
    The Insane Acidbaron's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Belgium, Flanders
    Posts
    18,230
    Not sure how this is a win for the consumer and claiming that these things are less dangerous without any actual data to support that.

  8. #8
    Deleted
    Nicotine still is a dangerous drug. Noone should start if he never smoked, or feel the need to try it out. It is still very unhealthy for the brain.

  9. #9
    The Lightbringer Dr Assbandit's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,804
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    That sucker went off like a rocket in his pocket.
    Can you imagine if he was refilling gas at a station right at that moment?
    "It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum... and I'm all outta ass."

    I'm a British gay Muslim Pakistani American citizen, ask me how that works! (terribly)

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Acidbaron View Post
    Not sure how this is a win for the consumer and claiming that these things are less dangerous without any actual data to support that.
    https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects...rm-reduction-0

    Feel free to read through the report. And the jury is still mostly out, but hindering advancement on something that has the potential to save lives, reduce medical costs, and allow people an option that is potentially, significantly less dangerous should be a goal everyone has.
    No man really becomes a fool until he stops asking questions.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Assbandit View Post
    Can you imagine if he was refilling gas at a station right at that moment?
    Addicts will do foolish things. I have seen people smoking while filling up at fuel station.

  12. #12
    The Lightbringer Dr Assbandit's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,804
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    Addicts will do foolish things. I have seen people smoking while filling up at fuel station.
    That's like a Darwin award waiting to happen with potentially taking others lives with you. I've heard of firework accidents and fires started in clothing factories for less.
    "It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum... and I'm all outta ass."

    I'm a British gay Muslim Pakistani American citizen, ask me how that works! (terribly)

  13. #13
    The Insane Acidbaron's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Belgium, Flanders
    Posts
    18,230
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadoweye View Post
    https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects...rm-reduction-0

    Feel free to read through the report. And the jury is still mostly out, but hindering advancement on something that has the potential to save lives, reduce medical costs, and allow people an option that is potentially, significantly less dangerous should be a goal everyone has.
    Smoking tobacco also used to be promoted as a healthy "break" habit. The problem is we do not know what harm those chemicals do long term.

    So far i know the US isn't that hard on smoking in general or tobacco warnings. These things should most definitely be seen as harmful as with all other chemicals until they can be proven to be otherwise.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Acidbaron View Post
    Smoking tobacco also used to be promoted as a healthy "break" habit. The problem is we do not know what harm those chemicals do long term.

    So far i know the US isn't that hard on smoking in general or tobacco warnings. These things should most definitely be seen as harmful as with all other chemicals until they can be proven to be otherwise.
    You are literally asking for people to make a determination without evidence, until evidence can be found...

    - - - Updated - - -

    If people want to kill themselves with cigarettes, I'm fine with that. If they want to vape themselves to death, I'm also fine with that.

  15. #15
    Stealthed Defender unbound's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    All that moves is easily heard in the void.
    Posts
    6,798
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadoweye View Post
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.ac367d84fc7b

    The FDA is pulling back the August 2018 deadline, until 2022. I personally consider this a huge victory, for the time being, for the E-cig industry.

    Hopefully, more science with come out showing these products, and devices (properly used) are a lot less dangerous than the cigarette/tobacco alternative.
    Sigh...less dangerous doesn't equal not dangerous.

  16. #16
    The Insane Acidbaron's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Belgium, Flanders
    Posts
    18,230
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    You are literally asking for people to make a determination without evidence, until evidence can be found...

    - - - Updated - - -

    If people want to kill themselves with cigarettes, I'm fine with that. If they want to vape themselves to death, I'm also fine with that.
    You are aware that when it comes to chemicals in products the average consumer has access to that these have to always be proven to not be harmful or at the least come with the correct warnings to be allowed in the market.

    It is simply common sense.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Acidbaron View Post
    You are aware that when it comes to chemicals in products the average consumer has access to that these have to always be proven to not be harmful or at the least come with the correct warnings to be allowed in the market.

    It is simply common sense.
    Then you are asking for a determination to be made before evidence is actually found. That's no different than assuming guilt, and someone has to prove their innocence.

    No thanks, I'll settle for facts and science.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Allybeboba View Post
    When I was in vacation earlier this year someone's e-cigarette literally exploded mere feet away from us. It frickin' nuts. I had flashbacks.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KR7_xwQbYp0

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pTehBeQHvHM

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Aft9m2uEXxE

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4D3afTbbwUI
    The one I'm using now comes with a warning to always turn off the battery when not using it or charging it or putting it in your pocket. I won't lie this worries me.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Thelxi View Post
    The one I'm using now comes with a warning to always turn off the battery when not using it or charging it or putting it in your pocket. I won't lie this worries me.
    I feel really bad for laughing out load when watching that first video. I bet that guy got burned really bad.
    It was spectacular though.

  20. #20
    The Insane Acidbaron's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Belgium, Flanders
    Posts
    18,230
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    Then you are asking for a determination to be made before evidence is actually found. That's no different than assuming guilt, and someone has to prove their innocence.

    No thanks, I'll settle for facts and science.
    This a normal procedure, do you rather have things come on the market and then to be taking off because they are harmful? Since that is what you are advocating here.

    If yes that's your opinion to have, i however would like it that the government continues to demand the producer of said product to provide enough evidence that their product is not harmful to the public, but you might prefer that corporation interests are more important and that a human life is worth not that much, so that products should only be subject to such things when there is actual evidence, in this case more likely a death or a long term illness and what not.

    Yes, i'm mocking you now cause really what i'm saying is the standard in the western world and acting that what i'm suggesting is strange is rather normal. And if this product is something where they don't know for certain its long term effects are harmful we know it of nicotine and that alone warrants plenty of warnings for the consumer.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •