Twitter really needs an edit button but holy shit. Just another example of how flippantly and retardedly he tweets online. Does his phone not have an auto-correct? Is he using a flip phone from 2005?
- - - Updated - - -
The Boston PD just talked about what I assume is this.
They found 3 protestors in body armor and after taking them back to the police department, they found one of them had a gun.
So this was confirmed by the cops.
"pigs in a blanket fry them like bacon?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJSeeyqL_Fc
"What do we wan't dead cops when do we wan't it now" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqQXmnMr_w8
But they're not a hate group.
http://www.snopes.com/black-lives-ma...n-baton-rouge/
Also, got sources for the two cases you mentioned earlier?
You don't...you don't see how it being attributed to them despite it happening at at different place, at a different time, and in a wholly different march with a different group of people is misleading?
Anything to smear your enemies I guess. Criticize BLM all you want. I don't like them and find them wholly reductive in the discussion of race. But don't sit there and engage in deliberate lying to do so.
LOL, #TrumpMustResign because some random dude wearing a MAGA hat broke the law.
Let's ignore the 27 arrests (so far) of counter-protestors, most for violence. Only share facts if they support your views.
The cops here are doing a good job of getting troublemakers on both sides off the streets.
Only a great fool would vote for a lunatic. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the candidate on the Right.
But they must have known I was not a great fool, and would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the corrupt candidate on the Left.
You'da thunk it eh? You can protest free speech without being a racist/sexist/homophobe/whateverist and as long as the approach is mature and actually focuses on the problem, no one will fight it. Charlottesville was racism at it's most obvious, this seems more like a real free speech protest aimed at fighting back against loud mouthed fascists on the left who are denying conservatives their right to speak, even when the speakers aren't known for hate speech or racism.
I mean you're flatout just lying here.
The cops didn't say the 27 arrests were counter protesters. They didn't even say it was because of violence. I just sat here and watched the entire press conference from the Boston PD. They flatout talked about a 3rd group, that wasn't the protesters or counter protesters, who were there to agitate.
Maybe take your own advice about sharing "facts."
Much like the left claim every gathering of more than 10 white people is a White supremecist rally... A trump rally during election time WHITE SURPREMECIST RALLY... A conservative Speaker NAZI NAZI NAZI.. I mean shit i'm surprised the left havn't started boycotting toby keith concerts as secret KKK gatherings.
Okay so whataboutism galore got it.
I find it funny that you and your ilk use this line in response to people talking about the actual, self-described, white supremacists and neo-nazis who were marching with swastikas and seig heiling Trump at their event.
Anything to deflect, huh? You really don't see how you're doing the literal exact same thing as the people you're whining about? REALLY? Eesh.
Being a member of the NAACP is also a choice.
As i said, a black man in the south did have free speech, after all the men lynching him weren't employed by the government.As I said, you can have all the dialogue you want. You HAVE freedom of speech, you don't have freedom from consequences of speech.
This doesn't relate to what i said in any way, you get that right?That describes your analogy between coloured people and the KKK more than anything. Are you honestly incapable of understanding the difference between something you can change, and something you cannot?Should people be able to say things that other people find offensive?And it doesn't mean that they should be excepted from consequences when they spew things that people find abhorrent.
Whether or not the repercussions are social or legal doesn't really matter, because the consequences does chill free speech.
Only a great fool would vote for a lunatic. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the candidate on the Right.
But they must have known I was not a great fool, and would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the corrupt candidate on the Left.