Originally Posted by
Ragedaug
I'm a little torn over it, and your example is why. That said, I tend to lean more to the idea of you get tried and prosecuted in the land you committed the crime, because I don't like the idea of diplomatic immunity. If someone committed a crime in my country, I would not think it fair or just that they receive no punishment or that they can just keep breaking our laws ad infinitum because it's not a crime in their country.
Ignorantia juris non excusat
Ultimately it's still up to the individual to know and follow the laws of the land they are traveling to. Apparently in Iraq "joining a terrorist organization" is a big no-no.
- - - Updated - - -
I think you are a bit confused. I think there are very few people who want to kill anyone they see as an "enemy". That's kinda an Antifa mindset, but I don't think they even go that far..at least in their public views.
The people I see in this thread are only for killing enemies who have sworn to kill them.
I think that distinction matters, and your willing disregard of it is disingenuous.
As far as "what makes us better?"
- They have no problem killing anyone that their beliefs tell them to kill and constantly kill innocents, including children, for the sake of their cause.
- "We" are only in favor of killing enemies who have openly attacked and killed us.
You honestly can't see a difference there?