Maybe they aren't. I mean it isn't unusual for content creators to actually have to produce something of worth that others might invest in. But up until now every YouTube content creator simply needs to come up with some bullshit meme to get popular and then suck the tit of their stupidity to a nice little paycheck.
Sometimes really doing some of the most inane to insane stupid shit imaginable. Like let see if this book will stop a 50 caliber bullet. Yeah, I am actually cool with advertisers says YEAH i am not paying for that shit.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
The most questionable activity has been when content creators load up new videos into the unreleased section without any metadata. Yet YouTube's algos decide to demonetize the video ahead of time.
It's not a terrible thing though, it motivates new platforms which separate funding and content.
It also gives room for new startups to have a competitive advantage. Anybody who thinks these businesses are too big to ever compete against are wrong.
No it isn't and you can type however angry you want about it, and hand wave this flagrant horse shit, "You just a hata" nonsense concerning the issue. Most if not all the loud mouth losers I have seen complaining on YouTube about this shit are the same inconsiderate asshats who up until now made a pretty nice living off looking down their nose at other people all the while, making money that wasn't theirs entertaining losers who obviously can't even pony up 10$ out of their own pockets to pay for this oh so AWESOME content.
If they do, more power to them, at least none else is forced to be broadcast this shit that the vendor nor advertisers wants to pay for.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean its worthless.
You know what I don't like? Starbucks. It's not even a real company. It coffee is awful and I'm pretty sure they're just squatting on the property they're located at.
OR.
It is popular, provides a service OTHER people like, and they get paid for it.
People produce stuff on youtube, and get paid for it because its POPULAR. They aren't popular because lots of people don't like it but watch it anyway. Just because YOU don't like it doesn't mean it doesn't have worth to people. Obviously, if they have enough viewers to get paid, they have enough viewers to be relevant.
Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads"Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab
You are right me and a few million feel the same, so why should we support a vendor or advertisers to pay money for content we don't want or like because others might have sold them we give a shit because we might have been click baited into a cheap view, legitimate or otherwise.
Yeah so pay for it, don't try to convince advertisers they should pay for it, because you think I care what you drink and I am going to want a cup.
Popularity =/= value. You will learn this lesson eventually because YouTube and The advertisers more importantly got that memo.
- - - Updated - - -
hahah you can make an insult that means nothing because you have nothing to say. Great glad we cleared that up.
You disagreed with me so you're angry I guess. Then we can move on.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
all your posts so far are you moaning about how YT content creators are more fun and entertaining than you are.
here, have this empty wine glass, fart into it, take a big whiff, and tell me how great it smells. there's some content you and the other pretentious fucks can enjoy.
If you don't like something you don't have to support it. I'm not sure what you're getting at here. You act like you're forced to watch an entire video even if you don't like it.
That's the entire point of ADVERTISING. They want people who don't do a thing, to do that thing. So they pay people who produce a thing you do want (the video) and you pay with getting advertised to. Of course, the patreon system cuts all that out, which is also fine. But it also cuts out a chunk of people who want something but can't pay for it.Yeah so pay for it, don't try to convince advertisers they should pay for it, because you think I care what you drink and I am going to want a cup.
Popularity is definitely value when it comes to this. If anything, it's a core concept.Popularity =/= value. You will learn this lesson eventually because YouTube and The advertisers more importantly got that memo.
Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads"Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab
#boycottchina
What real world do you speak of exactly? They create content, and get paid based on viewership almost entirely based on advertising dollars. If you don't believe that the 'real world' garners a significant amount of money from exactly this, perhaps you need to go out in it first
- - - Updated - - -
The entire stock market would like a word with you.
So, the only reason you would use a product is because of where they advertise? And what about that other few million who give a shit about that content? Do they don't matter? Only the ones that agree with you matter?
You're delusional if you think an advertiser places an add on anything because of its quality. The super bowl ads don't cost and absurd about of money because its good*, but because the reach the event has. For an advertiser is worthless if a show/video/whatever is the best thing ever if no one sees it.
*Not saying that is bad either the point is not about the quality of the event, but about the amount of money it costs to place an add during it.
I must ask if some of the bigger cashcows have being hit by demonetization. I know pewdiepie has, but I feel that's entirely a different can of worms due to the different controversies he's caused (not to mention that despite this I don't know how hard has he been hit). Most of the times I see demonetization is people who put effort into it (some might put more effort than others), while the ones that do retarded shit and get millions of views (and ad money) seem to be doing ok. So I wonder if its another case of Youtube also applying the rules selectively so it seems like they're doing something while at the same time keeping the bigger cashcows going.
Wish he'd just got to bed rather than drunk troll us with his "wisdom" .....
"making money that wasn't theirs entertaining losers" That's some solid entitlement and privilege combined with showing his level of understanding of how the world works lol
I don't agree with a lot of the rules YT have with handling content. They just want to single out easy impressionable youths to blast them with ads /puke
Last edited by Tiwack; 2017-09-30 at 09:11 PM.
If you knew the candle was fire then the meal was cooked a long time ago.
they are putting in most of the times more time doing youtube videos than a normal 9-5 job, i know this might shock you but they count as legit jobs. That is the real world. Just becuase they are not working manual labor or in a office doesnt mean they arnt in the real world.
Gravy train coming to an end. People are worried.
Same story, different industry is all.