View Poll Results: Your stance on Evolution.

Voters
171. This poll is closed
  • Yes, evolution has happened as the accepted theory says.

    134 78.36%
  • Yes, evolution is real however a higher power designed this

    27 15.79%
  • No, evolution is not real but creationism has holes in it

    1 0.58%
  • No, Creationism is the truth.

    9 5.26%
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ...
5
6
7
8
9
LastLast
  1. #121
    Stealthed Defender unbound's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    All that moves is easily heard in the void.
    Posts
    6,798
    I don't "believe" in evolution, but I do accept it since it has a tremendous amount of evidence backing the theory and no major component of the theory has been shown to be incorrect to date.

    The opposite I would put out is Last Thursdayism. The universe as we know it was created last Thursday, and all the evidence of the past was created that way as was the memories you have of anything prior to last Thursday.

  2. #122
    Id take a 5th option, yes it has happened and its real, but probably not quite like the theory has it, there are many other factors other than "survival of the fittest and randomness". The roles viruses play for example seems to be quite understated.
    We may never know the truth, but yeah, i do accept evolution even if i find the dominating theory...lacking.

  3. #123
    The Unstoppable Force Mayhem's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    pending...
    Posts
    23,973
    Quote Originally Posted by unbound View Post
    The opposite I would put out is Last Thursdayism. The universe as we know it was created last Thursday, and all the evidence of the past was created that way as was the memories you have of anything prior to last Thursday.
    sooooo physics and chemical reactions are made up?
    Quote Originally Posted by ash
    So, look um, I'm not a grief counselor, but if it's any consolation, I have had to kill and bury loved ones before. A bunch of times actually.
    Quote Originally Posted by PC2 View Post
    I never said I was knowledge-able and I wouldn't even care if I was the least knowledge-able person and the biggest dumb-ass out of all 7.8 billion people on the planet.

  4. #124
    The Lightbringer Lora's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Some random weird place
    Posts
    3,115
    I don't "believe" in evolution. Belief has nothing to do with something that is essentially a fact. My counter argument for it? The force because may it always be with you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Uggorthaholy View Post
    Thanks but no thanks, Lora, for making me question everything in existence forever.

  5. #125
    I would try to put together a coherent argument for creationism, however there is none.

  6. #126
    People will develop time travel, go to the first moments of the planet / galaxy / universe, and seed life that will eventually evolve into people that develop time travel.....

  7. #127
    Quote Originally Posted by Winter Blossom View Post
    What if the "higher power" is aliens? Like, some 'Prometheus' type shit (movie). I'm open to that idea.
    That would be quite awesome tbh. We could be, for all we know, a terraforming agent considering how much impact on the world we have.
    Soon our overlords will return, turn us into nutrient mash, devour us and settle on this wonderful planet with high concentrations of co2, methane, low oxigen, where their own flora thrives.

  8. #128
    Quote Originally Posted by Aori View Post
    When someone says they believe in evolution, generally that means they believe Man came from sea snot.
    I always love this [reductionist?] attitude some people take when talking about evolution. As if making its implications sound as unpleasant as possible is somehow evidence against its validity.

    Hate to break it to you, but when you (and nearly every other human on the planet) were born, you were nothing but a helpless mewling sack of need, covered in various bodily fluids, who your mother squeezed out of her vagina nine months after your sweaty father finished having sex with her. Sounds pretty gross, right? Does this mean that we should propose the Stork Theory of Human Reproduction instead?
    Last edited by s_bushido; 2015-02-24 at 01:30 PM.

  9. #129
    Quote Originally Posted by Winter Blossom View Post
    It would be cool. Like, aliens just trying to keep intelligent life going in the universe. Going from habitable planet to habitable planet, making that "spark of life" from themselves.
    Thats a hopeful glass-half full view of it, but yeah it would be quite fun.
    We could also be a simulation, advanced aliens curious how life has evolved before they achieved a level of enlightenment and simply seeded us here to see how things may have worked on their planet.

  10. #130
    Quote Originally Posted by Revi View Post
    First of all, the complexity of life and the existence of many traits that would not in any way be significant enough to help survival, thus would not be selected for through natural selection, and because life exists in so many forms with so many traits that would not be selected for through natural selection, it is more likely that there is a guiding hand.
    Complex life can come about without a "guiding hand". The Earth is a big place, so it's not like one species is going to completely die out all over the planet.

    Quote Originally Posted by Revi View Post
    Secondly, if the theory of evolution and our knowledge of how life supposedly came into existence on it's own is correct, then we wouldn't be so alone in the universe (see the Fermi paradox). But we are so alone in our universe, which proves that the earth is special, and that life doesn't come into being by itself the way we think, it needs to be created. And if something is created, there is a creator.
    The Earth is "special" in that it just happened to be the right distance from a star to have temperatures that sustain life. No "creation" required.

    Quote Originally Posted by Revi View Post
    Those who claim there is no god and no guidance have consistently failed to prove that claim so at this point it would be, to use their own rhetoric, unscientific to say there is no god. Evolution is just a theory, but creation is a divine fact.
    The problem is that you have also failed to prove your claim of "divine fact". Spouting off "creator! creator! creationism!" without a single grain of proof.

    "You can't prove me wrong so it's still a possibility!!" is a dumb argument, rebutted by "There is a teapot orbiting the sun. Since you can't prove me wrong, it's still a possibility."

  11. #131
    Quote Originally Posted by s_bushido View Post
    I always love this [reductionist?] attitude some people take when talking about evolution. As if making its implications sound as unpleasant as possible is somehow evidence against its validity.

    Hate to break it to you, but when you (and nearly every other human on the planet) were born, you were nothing but a helpless mewling sack of need, covered in various bodily fluids, who your mother squeezed out of her vagina nine months after your sweaty father finished having sex with her. Sounds pretty gross, right? Does this mean that we should propose the Stork Theory of Human Reproduction instead?
    Dont forget another important thing, he is also a product of the culture he was born in, here he born in a deep jungle tribal environment chances are his IQ would be very fairly low.
    Our current level of intelligence is mostly a result of the culture we are inserted on, the constant education, stimulation and effort to grow and know more. Without that, we really are nothing special.
    Wild children experiments are fascinating in that regard, how a child grown outside of a form of civilization wont even be capable of learning a language, even standing upright is hard.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Winter Blossom View Post
    What if it's some shit like The Matrix? Not necessarily robots, though.
    To be honest, maybe we're nothing more than Sims 43, by Activision-EA-Bethesda conglomerate.

  12. #132
    I find it hard to argue the opposite of what I believe in this case. It's something that I usually enjoy doing, but evolution just makes too much darn sense to me.

  13. #133
    Quote Originally Posted by Aori View Post
    Evolution is a very complicated theory, it would take quite a bit of effort to keep up with. I'm not denying evolution, I do deny view points taken from evolutionary theory. When someone says they believe in evolution, generally that means they believe Man came from sea snot. The reason I use Micro vs Macro is that it is the simplest way to state my stance on the matter. I could use variation but people will argue that in the same matter. I guess you could say I struggle with common descent which when someone says evolution that is what most think of.
    For creationists, macro- and microevolution are two different kinds of evolution. For scientists, it's just two different time-scales describing the same thing.
    "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance

  14. #134
    Ive always thought about it like this. Evolution is real. We can describe how every single organism came to be by understanding evolution. Except for the very first organism. How did that living thing come to be? Was it chemicals interacting with eachother that became more complex until it became a life? Or did God create it? You can believe in God and evolution at the same time.

  15. #135
    The Lightbringer Aori's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Southern Illinois
    Posts
    3,654
    Quote Originally Posted by s_bushido View Post
    I always love this [reductionist?] attitude some people take when talking about evolution. As if making its implications sound as unpleasant as possible is somehow evidence against its validity.

    Hate to break it to you, but when you (and nearly every other human on the planet) were born, you were nothing but a helpless mewling sack of need, covered in various bodily fluids, who your mother squeezed out of her vagina nine months after your sweaty father finished having sex with her. Sounds pretty gross, right? Does this mean that we should propose the Stork Theory of Human Reproduction instead?
    Not sure what you're getting at. Your hostility is noted however.

  16. #136
    The Unstoppable Force Mayhem's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    pending...
    Posts
    23,973
    Quote Originally Posted by Winter Blossom View Post
    I hear people talk about seeing ghosts and spirits and I think, what if that ghost is actually the real person? Like, the "body" that "died" was actually their computer stimulation and the ghost is some far more advanced being of the actual person.

    Maybe the real me decided to try a "sims" type computer life.
    Or you just underestimate the power of your brain. I mean if it can make up shit you never did just because it happened to friends why not ghosts?
    Quote Originally Posted by ash
    So, look um, I'm not a grief counselor, but if it's any consolation, I have had to kill and bury loved ones before. A bunch of times actually.
    Quote Originally Posted by PC2 View Post
    I never said I was knowledge-able and I wouldn't even care if I was the least knowledge-able person and the biggest dumb-ass out of all 7.8 billion people on the planet.

  17. #137
    While I'm glad that most people acknowledge that scientists are basically right, the cocky attitude people have about "knowing" something that they can't explain worth a shit is really offputting. As someone with a science background, I could easily argue the intelligent design perspective in a fashion that would technically beat the majority of people in a formal debate.

  18. #138
    Quote Originally Posted by Winter Blossom View Post
    I hear people talk about seeing ghosts and spirits and I think, what if that ghost is actually the real person? Like, the "body" that "died" was actually their computer stimulation and the ghost is some far more advanced being of the actual person.

    Maybe the real me decided to try a "sims" type computer life.
    its not like theres lack of hints for it.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYGZQnNkHh0
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/...-hologram.html


    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Mayhem View Post
    Or you just underestimate the power of your brain. I mean if it can make up shit you never did just because it happened to friends why not ghosts?
    yeah, and dreams so real you are convinced its reality.

  19. #139
    Deleted
    I want a similar thread for the germ theory of disease and the theory of gravity.

    I refuse to believe that gravity isn't guided by god!

    It's 2015 and this is still an "issue" with the general population.

  20. #140
    The Unstoppable Force Mayhem's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    pending...
    Posts
    23,973
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurioxan View Post
    yeah, and dreams so real you are convinced its reality.
    I swear to glob i have been shot 3 times in the night from sunday to monday and my friends took me to disneyland instead of the hospital because we had tickets. I even had fun until i passed out because of pain and loss of blood.
    Quote Originally Posted by ash
    So, look um, I'm not a grief counselor, but if it's any consolation, I have had to kill and bury loved ones before. A bunch of times actually.
    Quote Originally Posted by PC2 View Post
    I never said I was knowledge-able and I wouldn't even care if I was the least knowledge-able person and the biggest dumb-ass out of all 7.8 billion people on the planet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •