'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
It is like 1500 pages of pretty dense scientific review. And that's just the WG1, the physical science basis for AGCC, not the adaptation measures and so forth that other WGs get into.
I don't expect most people to ever read it, but you should be able to run through the Summary for Policymakers section if you're interested/curious about the subject.
I know from personal observation that climate changes.
Nevertheless, I find it funny that even among the pro-science people there are plenty of those who blindly believe, instead of questioning everything (like a scientist would).
They simply substituted word "religion" with "science" and keep at it.
Rincewind: Ah! We may, in fact, have reached the root of the problem. However it's a silly problem and so I am suddenly going to stop talking to you.
The better character questionnaire (D&D)
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
I can prove man made climate change 100%. It was hot in my house today. I turned the A/C on. My house went from 72% to 69%. Bam. Man made climate change. The only solution brought to you by most liberal ideology is to kill jobs. get rid of affordable energy. Abolish the middle class.
There's no valid reason to assume the best case scenario (and, in this case a .6 degree change over 140 years is the best case scenario of the best case emissions scenario) except to try and make it seem like not a problem.
Would you object to me declaring that there will be a 5.5 degree C change? If so, you'll be a hypocrite because what I did is equally as invalid as what you did.
http://fortune.com/2015/01/16/solar-jobs-report-2014/
Renewable is already a pretty big sector.
There is no climate change. Don't worry, after we're all dead, the planet can start over. No loss.
You're really brave standing up to a whole... 5% of voters.
In the last political poll that I saw, Republicans were around 20% of Gen-OT voters. The majority do not deny climate change, so shouting at a small percent of people is somewhat ignorant unless you are just trying to shame that small percent. And thats assuming the people who picked the "oil" choice were not trolling.
I don't think you understand the difference between "developing new technology" and simply buying things like silicon solar panels. China is a good example. They likely have more panels than any other country, but they are not more technologically developed in the field than the US or Europe.
Last edited by PC2; 2015-07-24 at 07:08 AM.
saying you trust science and then say you believe whatever other scientists say is not trusting science. science is about trying to prove an idea wrong. The global average temperature has gone up less than 1 degree celsius in 130 years
thread poll choices are heavily skewed and bad.
Last edited by zhero; 2015-07-24 at 07:13 AM.
Here you go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ6Z04VJDco
Evidence for climate change without using computer models or the IPCC. And if you watch his other videos, he also complains about the apocalyptic predictions made by people like Al Gore as well.