Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
... LastLast
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Justiceright View Post
    So in our class, we had a debate as for the ethicacy of forcible sterilizations of very serious violent criminals. Some of the arguments were that children born from convicted violent criminals tend to have a much higher risk of becomming a criminal when compared to the general public even when income and education was factored. And the point is if we'd just serialized all serious violent criminals as part of the condition for the possibility of parole, that could dramatically cut down violent crime.

    Do you support the notion that ALL seriously violent crime (Rape, Child molestation, serious assault and battery, etc) should carry a mandatory life sentence, and that the possibility of parole will be added IF the criminal agrees to the sterilization?

    IMO, if you violate the law, you give up your right to reproduce. I personally do not see the right of reproduction as a fundamental human right if you are a violent individual. Society has the obligation to protect the right of life and safety for everyone. You are not just effecting yourself, you are effecting another person: the person being born. But a counter point is that this would be a slippery slope to potential serious human rights violations...

    What are your thoughts on this issue? I'm a bit torn...
    I'm for it if it's done through hanging, firing squad or ridin' ole sparky. If you can't trust a person in society then why keep that person alive to drain resources.
    Me thinks Chromie has a whole lot of splaining to do!

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Zantos View Post
    I only assumed preventing reproducing through sperm and what not. Either way, it still wouldn't help rectify the situation.
    Then yes, its a pointless 'punishment'. The US populace has got to get away from this whole 'punishment' thing that we do to criminals. Criminals need to be removed from society until it is believed they will not commit crimes again, and understand what they did. Punishing them for the rest of their lives, even after you let them out of prison, doesn't help anyone, and especially doesn't help them not commit more crimes.
    Quote Originally Posted by xanzul View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by obdigore View Post
    So if the states get together and work with the Legislative Branch to write an amendment to the federal constitution, you think the Judiciary (SCOTUS) could strike it down for being 'unconstitutional'?
    Uh...yes. Absolutely.

  3. #23
    I am Murloc! zephid's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    5,110
    Quote Originally Posted by Spiffums View Post
    I'm for it if it's done through hanging, firing squad or ridin' ole sparky. If you can't trust a person in society then why keep that person alive to drain resources.
    It's cheaper to just keep them locked up for the rest of their lives than it is to execute them.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by De thuong View Post
    I don't think wage has much influence on if people commit some crimes or not. Our murder rate is similar to your country but what you can earn in some hours of work there many earn in a month here.
    Amount isn't important. How much you pay for essentials in comparison to the amount you make is the big thing.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Spectral View Post
    Vasectomies are reversible.
    Are you assuming all criminals are male?


  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by zephid View Post
    It's cheaper to just keep them locked up for the rest of their lives than it is to execute them.
    You realize that people like that generally don't care about things like facts and research.
    Quote Originally Posted by xanzul View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by obdigore View Post
    So if the states get together and work with the Legislative Branch to write an amendment to the federal constitution, you think the Judiciary (SCOTUS) could strike it down for being 'unconstitutional'?
    Uh...yes. Absolutely.

  6. #26
    Only if we start with all the little Mengele wannabes here.

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by obdigore View Post
    Then yes, its a pointless 'punishment'. The US populace has got to get away from this whole 'punishment' thing that we do to criminals. Criminals need to be removed from society until it is believed they will not commit crimes again, and understand what they did. Punishing them for the rest of their lives, even after you let them out of prison, doesn't help anyone, and especially doesn't help them not commit more crimes.
    I could see it having the opposite effect because they would look down and remember what was done to them, get angry, and then go on a rampage.
    Quote Originally Posted by scorpious1109 View Post
    Why the hell would you wait till after you did this to confirm the mortality rate of such action?

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by zephid View Post
    It's cheaper to just keep them locked up for the rest of their lives than it is to execute them.
    This is a choice that societies have made to allow endless legal battles and to compensate lawyers a great deal to fight them. There's nothing intrinsic about killing someone that's more expensive than caring for them for decades.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Vanyali View Post
    Are you assuming all criminals are male?

    I mean, it's not a policy I'm advocating. From a thought experiment standpoint though, the vast majority of value you'd get is from sterilizing males. There are many more violent male criminals than females and they're capable of producing a lot more kids. That they're also the ones with reversible sterilization is convenient.

    A long-term IUD would be pretty comparable though.

  9. #29
    No, forced sterilization is just part of an escalating slippery slope that anyone who supports personal autonomy and is against excessive use of governmental power would be against. I'd rather see more crimes become capital offenses than normalize the populace to the idea of forced sterilization.
    The Fresh Prince of Baudelaire

    Banned at least 10 times. Don't give a fuck, going to keep saying what I want how I want to.

    Eat meat. Drink water. Do cardio and burpees. The good life.

  10. #30
    yes, it should.

    repeat offenders just shouldn't be allowed to spread their dysfunctional genetics.

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectral View Post
    I mean, it's not a policy I'm advocating. From a thought experiment standpoint though, the vast majority of value you'd get is from sterilizing males. There are many more violent male criminals than females and they're capable of producing a lot more kids. That they're also the ones with reversible sterilization is convenient.

    A long-term IUD would be pretty comparable though.
    I just wanted to poke fun at your comment, that's all. Mostly because of the way I read it.

  12. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by derpkitteh View Post
    yes, it should.

    repeat offenders just shouldn't be allowed to spread their dysfunctional genetics.
    Got any source material showing that rape is any part of someones genetics? I can understand if you think the rapist may teach their children to be disrespectful and otherwise foster a mentality that rape is ok, but its just not a part of their genes.
    Quote Originally Posted by scorpious1109 View Post
    Why the hell would you wait till after you did this to confirm the mortality rate of such action?

  13. #33
    All I have to say is the Nazis did a real public relations disservice to eugenics.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    You are a carbon copy of what you long so hard to fight in the streets. An extremist. Someone so desperate for strife to prove you are the ubermensch, err, Real American.

    Alt lite. Sounds like you're having an alt fright. Unable to sleep at alt night. Maybe you should relax and fly an alt kite. Go down to the diner for an alt bite. You shouldn't be treating people with alt spite. Eventually, everything will be alt right.

  14. #34
    Over 9000! Poppincaps's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Twilight Town
    Posts
    9,498
    Quote Originally Posted by zephid View Post
    It's cheaper to just keep them locked up for the rest of their lives than it is to execute them.
    How? I don't see how a bullet is more expensive than a lifetime of food and other necessities. I don't care for the death penalty, but that doesn't make any sense.

  15. #35
    I am Murloc! zephid's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    5,110
    Quote Originally Posted by De thuong View Post
    I get about $50 per month, rent is $100. :/
    Yes you earn less money than someone who lives in the United States, but your cost of living is also lower.

  16. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Poppincaps View Post
    How? I don't see how a bullet is more expensive than a lifetime of food and other necessities. I don't care for the death penalty, but that doesn't make any sense.
    Essentially, cases where the death penalty is available can only be tried by specific lawyers, heard by specific judges, are entitled to something like 3-4 reviews by other judges, take up a ton of court time, and then they still wait 20-30 years while they try to get retrials and stuff.

    It's cheaper to house an inmate in the prison system for 50 years then have them do all that, while housing them for 20.

    And we still manage to execute people who turn out to be innocent. Hooray!
    Quote Originally Posted by xanzul View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by obdigore View Post
    So if the states get together and work with the Legislative Branch to write an amendment to the federal constitution, you think the Judiciary (SCOTUS) could strike it down for being 'unconstitutional'?
    Uh...yes. Absolutely.

  17. #37
    I am Murloc!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Orange, Ca
    Posts
    5,836
    So you're going to give a rapist a free vasectomy and set him free?

    And that will stop them from raping how?

  18. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by Poppincaps View Post
    How? I don't see how a bullet is more expensive than a lifetime of food and other necessities. I don't care for the death penalty, but that doesn't make any sense.
    Its the process that the death penalty involves that rises the cost.
    Quote Originally Posted by scorpious1109 View Post
    Why the hell would you wait till after you did this to confirm the mortality rate of such action?

  19. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by Justiceright View Post
    Do you support the notion that ALL seriously violent crime (Rape, Child molestation, serious assault and battery, etc) should carry a mandatory life sentence, and that the possibility of parole will be added IF the criminal agrees to the sterilization?
    Considering the recent stance on rape, NO!
    I dont think a drunk student hooking up with another drunk student should be punished by a lifetime sentence. (and yes, this is considered rape in todays society)

  20. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Zantos View Post
    Got any source material showing that rape is any part of someones genetics? I can understand if you think the rapist may teach their children to be disrespectful and otherwise foster a mentality that rape is ok, but its just not a part of their genes.
    there's been studies that say some people are genetically predisposed to violence and violent acts.

    these people usually turn out to be repeat offenders of assaults and other violent crimes. so, not just rape, but assaults as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •