The mere notion you are trying to promote has more flaws tahn letters.
1.Intelligence isn't subjective.
2.You tell us that making an effort to not suffer the danger of beeing eaten every day is an excersise in futility.
3.We are not at the top of the foodchain because we are empathic, who the hell says that? Who are these "people"?
4.We are at the top of the foodchain becasue we are capable to devise and use tools.
5.You suggest we are at the botto of the foodchain becasue we are empathic?
6.Deal with it, we are better than every animal since we can compensate our shortcommings with technology.
7.You should hav shortened your statement by two words and you'd actually be arguing about society instead of biology, which would actually have something to argue about.
Your "intelligence" makes dogs run after an invisible ball...