Like killing a goat for Allah? If muslims get to keep that tradition, I think a crib with a doll it it should be fine aswell.
It's real (I'm from Belgium), it's non-muslims complaining about it though. It just makes me wonder why they're doing this so suddeny. Antwerp has a large amount of jews in the city yet they were never given the same consideration AFAIK.
I don't nescessarily disagree. There's plenty of women wearing a burqa and whatnot, so that'd have to go aswell. That aside, there's still Catholic schools in Belgium that teach religion (though it's luckily not exclussively about god/jesus and stuff anymore). Stuff like that makes banning this tradition all the more ridiculous.
They can be pretty expensive actually; although I'm entirely okay with lights and trees as they're regarded as more secular.
That said, there is a Nativity outside my own town hall, it's probably 70 years old or something and was paid for long ago, certainly looks that way. If the 'star' on it wasn't a massive Pentacle, it'd probably annoy me a bit more. I'm not going to ask for it to be removed, but I wouldn't regard it as tasteful.
The Burqa is offensive to me, so it should be banned.
If the above is not a natural consequence of the OP, then we (shocker, I know) live in a society with double standards and should take efforts to correct this. I am not religious and I don't give a flying fuck about church bells ringing time and again on the 24th where I live. Wouldn't it be nice if the same sort of "I don't care"-ness could be extended the other ways around.
The traditional star you put on a Nativity is 4 or 8 pointed with an elongated bottom point; I just found it funny that they chose to use a Wicker 5 pointed star in a circle (pointing upward) that's usually associated with Wicca, or "devil worship" as some Christians might believe.
How can people be against Nativity? Even if you deny the divine nature of our Lord Jesus Christ, the birth of Man is one of the most precious things. Banning it makes no sense.
You said that plenty of traditions were better left to history. I made the "wild" assumption that you were specifically talking about the tradition in the OP. I just mentioned that if that tradition was 'better left to history', there's some others that should probably go first.
Tricky one that entirely depends on the wearer's reasons for wearing it. It shouldn't be banned for those willingly wearing it any more than any other voluntary wearing of religious attire or symbols should be banned. Problem is that the Burqa is often 'enforced' and punishments dealt for not-wearing it, and that is entirely unacceptable and should not be tolerated. Herein you'll probably find that forcing someone to wear it by way of, usually violence or other abuse, is already illegal anyway and the problem is catching those people enforcing it.