Originally Posted by
Breccia
Is this sarcasm? Because it reads like you're intentionally being ridiculous.
The Constitution states, in many places, what limits the government has. If some random-ass Syrian staying in Syria has no contact with the US, the Constitution does not apply. However, the second they come to the US, we can't discriminate against him based purely on his religion. Nor can we violate his due process. As was cited in the 9th Circuit Court decision, specifically in this context.
And just to follow your ludicrious claims, I'm moderately sure the US government hasn't restricted other people in other countries from owning guns, unless we were invading during a war (which is kind of a different situation). So, it kind of still stands.
And...the 21st? Repealing the 18th? Even for a ridiculous sarcastic point, that didn't make sense. The 21st doesn't apply to ANYONE. It just removed the 18th.
Did you switch to decaf or something? I remember you being a better debater than this.
- - - Updated - - -
Yep. Shame that had no legal binding effect, huh?