I second this. No horns without Librams.Originally Posted by Banzubie
This IS the funniest thing I've ever read on the internet *applauds*Originally Posted by Deadmike
If curiosity killed the cat, why can't speculation kill you?
So where would paladins carry their visible librams?Originally Posted by Banzubie
Most paladins are busy facerolling things with big 2 handed weapons, or Healing / Tanking things with a 1hander and a shield. Either way, they dont actually have a hand free to carry their Visible Libram.
So really, what paladins nees is A THIRD ARM!
That way, they could 2H Faceroll, or Tank and Heal, all while waving their Visible Libram about.
Only if locks get their burning foot prints back that were removed in the original beta... and firey eyes... and demonic runes on their skin... and claw like nails... and pale skin with black veins showing through... and the beginnings of horns and spikes growing in various places...
See where I'm going with this? Any class can be visually distinguished to an obscene amount, but I seriously doubt Blizzard will go anywhere beyond their current level which is just gear and some abilities that make the classes stand out... :'(
Druids need an epic land form to be free from mounts. Mind you this would be something for cataclysm. With flying in azeroth coming world pvp wont mean squat. Plus keep the form out of arena and BG's....then no one can complain.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ir5j3SIp9bkOriginally Posted by Metallikiddd
You want that don't you?
I think it's already pretty well covered by the Tier sets.
What I'd prefer is if they instead added druids of the fang and you could choose if you wanted to be a druid of the fang or a druid of the claw. Where fang would be poison and claw would be bleeds. With appropriate form changes as well of course.
Broll Bearmantle is a special character, one of his unique traits being he has antlers. If every druid had antlers, Broll Bearmantle wouldn't be very special, would he?
Oh by the way, you already get antlers in moonkin form, and that is enough.
Last thing I promise - druids already visual distinction in appearance with their forms. And even their forms need more variety (tree/moonkin/travel). So yeah, I don't think we need perma-antlers or anything.
I'm sorry, but i just have to tell you that you are an ignorant, closed minded fool, and you need to chill out, think more, and quit being such a douche. Your responses are shrill, closed minded, and ignorant. You need to think outside the box sometimes, and realize its blizzards game and you are not ghostcrawler.
Druid of the claw-CatOriginally Posted by Shelly
Druid of the Paw-Bear
Druid of the moon-Guess your damn self
Druid of the talon-Bird druid
Druid of the fang-They are, to druids, what warlocks are to mages.
Originally Posted by Dark
They will never ever do this and here is why:Originally Posted by Metallikiddd
Too many druids have invested too much in their existing land mounts to have them be made completely obsolete.
I'm sorry, but i just have to tell you that you are an ignorant, closed minded fool, and you need to chill out, think more, and quit being such a douche. Your responses are shrill, closed minded, and ignorant. You need to think outside the box sometimes, and realize its blizzards game and you are not ghostcrawler.
which form are we talking about here? anyway:
Bear: No. i'd get scared as shit if i saw a bear with fucking antlers charging at me.
cat: ... dont pounce me plz..
travel form: meh okay i'll guess.
boomkin: same as travel form
tree: ... WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
flight: **** NO! it'll pierce through me from air, not cool
Haha, then you got a nice GM. Once had a guildy who's ZG snake "TrouserSnake" was renamed (by the GM) to Bob. Since this was way back in Vanilla, we all laughed at him and his snake that got "Bobbed".
Guess it could be a laugh yo see druids get an antilope form with the same cast time/restrictions as a regular mount =)