Build me a computer! please :D

[aggs]

Great build only thing I'd bring into question is the ram as the Mobo won't recognize anything other then 1066 and 1033

Memory Standard DDR3 2200(O.C.)/2133(O.C.)/1866(O.C.)/1600/1333/1066

[Tulion]

Memory Standard DDR3 2200(O.C.)/2133(O.C.)/1866(O.C.)/1600/1333/1066

I've linked two off Intel's site and can easily link more from overclocking sites stating the same thing. Where did you find this information?

[aggs]

You know the link to the mobo in which you stated doesn't support 1600... Also someone linked this piece earlier http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/mem...sandy-bridge/1

[Tulion]

Gonna look into this further, it appears you may be correct, and if so I owe you an apology.

[aggs]

No apology needed. I feel you may have misspoke as you linked references to the cpu memory controller which has nothing to do with the motherboards capability. Even though the chip lists it as well doesn't mean that it won't run at a higher rate either. Just as you can o.c. the chip the ram can run at the rated speed up to what the board supports, which this one does.

[Saithes]

Just to throw in my 2 cents, my P8P67 Pro recognizes up to DDR3 2133 in bios.

[Tulion]

Gonna look into this further, it appears you may be correct, and if so I owe you an apology.

/sorry
/apology
/QQ @ my failure

[Jurwi]

Great build only thing I'd bring into question is the ram as the Mobo won't recognize anything other then 1066 and 1333

TLDR save a few bucks and get some ram that is supported

Source: http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id...ec-codes=SR00C
http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id...ec-codes=SR008
Under Memory Specs: "Memory Types DDR3-1066/1333"

In how many threads are you going to keep repeating this same utter bullshit? There's not a single Sandy Bridge mobo on market that would only recognize DDR3 1066 and 1333.

[Kiniun]

In how many threads are you going to keep repeating this same utter bullshit? There's not a single Sandy Bridge mobo on market that would only recognize DDR3 1066 and 1333.

Hinaaja is correct.

[aggs]

No need to get upset about it, they apologized for the mistake. I think everything is going to be ok.

[Jurwi]

Nobody got upset, I just don't like it when people post utter crap especially on this sub forum where people might base their hardware purchases on those bad advices. And this wasn't the first thread where the guy was preaching about SB only supporting DDR3 1066 & 1333. He had already been presented loads of proof against that(The same article you linked as well), but he still didn't believe it and kept spamming the same thing here.