Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
LastLast
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Nakloh View Post
    My my, you're making me blush over here.
    : ^)
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Posting here is primarily a way to strengthen your own viewpoint against common counter-arguments.

  2. #22
    The Insane Underverse's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    The Underverse
    Posts
    16,333
    250 years is way too much for this crime. Clearly he is a disturbed, manipulative piece of shit. But the only crime he committed was coercion. I don't think coercion carries a 250 year sentence.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Quetzl View Post
    250 years is way too much for this crime. Clearly he is a disturbed, manipulative piece of shit. But the only crime he committed was coercion. I don't think coercion carries a 250 year sentence.
    AS far as I can tell, he's been found guilty of several seperate charges (something soliciting a child to produce child pornography something) due to the ongoing nature of the abuse so totally each individual charge could net a maximum of 250 years.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Posting here is primarily a way to strengthen your own viewpoint against common counter-arguments.

  4. #24
    Scarab Lord Triggered Fridgekin's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    4,951
    How much will his time in jail cost the state? I'm genuinely curious.
    A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon.

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Triggered Fridgekin View Post
    How much will his time in jail cost the state? I'm genuinely curious.
    Assuming 130$ a day and a 45 years till he passes ~$2.14 million.
    Quote Originally Posted by Elrandir View Post
    My starfall brings all the mobs to the yard.
    Laurellen - Druid Smiteyou - lol holy dps

  6. #26
    The Insane Underverse's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    The Underverse
    Posts
    16,333
    Quote Originally Posted by AeneasBK View Post
    AS far as I can tell, he's been found guilty of several seperate charges (something soliciting a child to produce child pornography something) due to the ongoing nature of the abuse so totally each individual charge could net a maximum of 250 years.
    Even if that's the case, I still can't see this sentence being justified. He could have outright raped her and walked away with a fraction of the sentence. Laws need to be careful not to provide incentives for more destructive criminal activity.

    This is basically just an abusive relationship, just involving a minor. I don't even think people are charged in relationships that are considered abusive because harm is difficult to prove (unless there's physical violence). All I see here is another gut reaction to criminal activity involving a minor. This doesn't strike me as justice.

  7. #27
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Quetzl View Post
    Even if that's the case, I still can't see this sentence being justified. He could have outright raped her and walked away with a fraction of the sentence. Laws need to be careful not to provide incentives for more destructive criminal activity.

    This is basically just an abusive relationship, just involving a minor. I don't even think people are charged in relationships that are considered abusive because harm is difficult to prove (unless there's physical violence). All I see here is another gut reaction to criminal activity involving a minor. This doesn't strike me as justice.
    If he had been middle eastern he would have gotten away with it.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Zantos View Post
    You're kidding right? Long beyond the 80 year point, it becomes a pointless number that has zero meaning.
    He's been convicted on multiple charges. Now let's say he appeals and actually manages to get some of those convictions overturned-- but he would still be on the hook for what will probably amount to a life sentence. That's the point of these sentences that are much, much longer than the average human lifespan.

  9. #29
    The same people who advocate for throwing the book at this guy, cheering on as the bailiff drags him away for multiple life sentences would, in many cases, be the same who defend the "just down on his luck" guy who robs 12 different stores and gets 30 years in prison.

    That being said they would both need to be put away just to protect society from them.

  10. #30
    Old God -aiko-'s Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    The House of All Worlds
    Posts
    10,920
    Quote Originally Posted by ReaperOwnz View Post
    Why 250 years, life without parole not good enough? :P
    Just what all of the charges add up to. Goes to show you how sick his acts were.

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by AndaliteBandit View Post
    He's been convicted on multiple charges. Now let's say he appeals and actually manages to get some of those convictions overturned-- but he would still be on the hook for what will probably amount to a life sentence. That's the point of these sentences that are much, much longer than the average human lifespan.
    It needs a special kind of logic to think adding up sentencings like this makes any kind of sense. It basically tells criminals "if you did this many minor crimes any more won't matter, you won't notice any difference anyway".

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by -aiko- View Post
    Just what all of the charges add up to. Goes to show you how sick his acts were.
    Mostly it shows that everything after he got to 60 years or something is free of charge because he won't notice a difference anyway.

  12. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Noradin View Post
    It needs a special kind of logic to think adding up sentencings like this makes any kind of sense. It basically tells criminals "if you did this many minor crimes any more won't matter, you won't notice any difference anyway".
    Minor crimes are not usually the ones that come with jail sentences of multiple years/decades.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jtbrig7390 View Post
    True, I was just bored and tired but you are correct.

    Last edited by Thwart; Today at 05:21 PM. Reason: Infracted for flaming
    Quote Originally Posted by epigramx View Post
    millennials were the kids of the 9/11 survivors.

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Linadra View Post
    Sounds about right. All murderers/pedos/rapists should get that kind of sentence.
    Sounds fine to me! Throw him away, never let him out!
    Quote Originally Posted by THE Bigzoman View Post
    Meant Wetback. That's what the guy from Home Depot called it anyway.
    ==================================
    If you say pls because it is shorter than please,
    I'll say no because it is shorter than yes.
    ==================================

  14. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by Linadra View Post
    Minor crimes are not usually the ones that come with jail sentences of multiple years/decades.
    Not that kind of minor, "minor" in the sense of "none among them is an automatic death sentence".

  15. #35
    After she managed to break things off, the girl received a message from someone claiming to be the boy’s mother on his account, saying he committed suicide.

    Holy crap!
    .

    "This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."

    -- Capt. Copeland

  16. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Noradin View Post
    It needs a special kind of logic to think adding up sentencings like this makes any kind of sense. It basically tells criminals "if you did this many minor crimes any more won't matter, you won't notice any difference anyway".
    Why should you get a discount on your sentencing for committing crime in bulk? This isn't Sam's Club.

  17. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by Noradin View Post
    Not that kind of minor, "minor" in the sense of "none among them is an automatic death sentence".
    I suppose that depends on where you live.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jtbrig7390 View Post
    True, I was just bored and tired but you are correct.

    Last edited by Thwart; Today at 05:21 PM. Reason: Infracted for flaming
    Quote Originally Posted by epigramx View Post
    millennials were the kids of the 9/11 survivors.

  18. #38
    The Forgettable Forgettable's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    5,180
    Who does that, seriously? Sick...

  19. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by AndaliteBandit View Post
    Why should you get a discount on your sentencing for committing crime in bulk? This isn't Sam's Club.
    They shouldn't. That is the point. By just adding sentencings up like this they waive everything that exceeds the convict's exspected lifetime.

  20. #40
    Pit Lord boyzma's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    In yer base, killing yer dudes
    Posts
    2,395
    My browser doesn't trust the site the article is linked to so can't read. However, I think anyone that does anything sexual with a child, be it 2 or 14 or 16 or whatever age is the scum of the earth and deserves every second of prison time they are sentanced to. Maybe sometimes the courts word it wrong, like life without the possibility of parole would have sufficed here. Always makes me scratch my head when someone gets like 4 or 5 life sentances. What, they're ordered to live out their time in prison then die, and in their next life come back and live in prison until they die again, ect ect? Also think he should be thrown into general population, they don't like baby rapers or pedo in prison, he wouldn't last long.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •