...That's...that's a retcon. I'm actually quite fucking pissed, now.
And about Derek, I mean, yeah, but...
You could literally say this about Delaryn and Sira as well.
- - - Updated - - -
Even Helya's death lines suggested that she died in Hellheim. THAT'S HER FUCKING REALM!
"You cannot kill death"
Guess I didn't slay Argus' World Soul then, since he was the "Death Titan".
What utter garbage.
- - - Updated - - -
That's Sargeras.
"The Universe is full of bad things, and dark tentacle bois. I better destroy the Universe so no more bad things happen".
I don't think that is just bad writing.
I've been saying there has to be some sort of mind control effect for being raised Undead for ages, despite the Forsaken Initial zone saying otherwise.
We have been witnessing people be killed by Forsaken, be raised and IMMEDIATLY turn coat against their former allies and fight for the Forsaken.
It's just becoming more obvious in this particular plot.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
brainfart level of character writing i have witnessed
the only hope i have is that this is gonna be a Big Twist when it will turn out that all Forsaken including Sylvanas were secretly controlled by Lich King/Other Death Deity unnoticed. the simulation of free will, matrix, so to speak.
Less a retcon and more of a development, I would say - but I don't really know what to think of it, either. On one hand, Helya's story-arc did seem pretty conclusively over; but on the other Helya was sort of already dead so killing her may not have produced the outcome we were hoping for (aside from releasing Odyn).
Delaryn and Sira's reactions are different, they just arrive at the same basic outcome for the time being.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Out of curiosity, didn't Blizz set up that when you get risen, the result is different for everyone? As an oversimplification from reading some of their works, some emotions remain or get amplified from when you were alive, some don't or may not be present anymore. I think it would be easy, from that standpoint, to explain away people's sudden shift in attitudes after becoming Forsaken. If you had some nagging doubts in the back of your mind, or maybe even potentially malicious or evil tendencies regardless of how minute they may be, becoming Forsaken may suppress whatever was holding you back from those doubts or conversely unleash the opposite. My guess would be the stronger your emotions that get amplified/suppressed, the more life-altering (pun intended) becoming a Forsaken may be. Not necessarily mind control in the classical sense since there's no implied intent behind it, but certainly not a race change with no side effects either.
“Society is endangered not by the great profligacy of a few, but by the laxity of morals amongst all.”
“It's not an endlessly expanding list of rights — the 'right' to education, the 'right' to health care, the 'right' to food and housing. That's not freedom, that's dependency. Those aren't rights, those are the rations of slavery — hay and a barn for human cattle.”
― Alexis de Tocqueville
I've long suspected the ramifications of Sylvanas' "deal" with Helya in Helheim weren't over with Legion, I just didn't expect Helya's character to come along for the ride so to speak. We'll have to see how it goes from here, though.
- - - Updated - - -
I think this is likely - Helya may prove to be a more important part of the ongoing story than we think. Whether or not she is a major player or simply a powerful lieutenant of some other force remains to be seen.
- - - Updated - - -
That was my hypothesis as well - the two remaining powers that could influence Vol'jin not already addressed are N'Zoth and now possibly Helya. Given the Void's (and presumably N'Zoth's as a creature of the Void) opposition to Death it would seem to make him an unlikely proponent of Sylvanas, but now that Helya is a possibility and given her connection to the realm of Death I would see her as the best possibility. Having Sylvanas, who now owes Helya for her assistance, as Warchief of the Horde gives Helya a powerful proxy-force for whatever machinations she has in mind.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead