Totally agree on the premise that people can stop painting anyone right of center or anyone who doesn't agree with every left wing agenda as "Alt-right"
Yes and no. This would apply to the more extremist adherents, sure, but to go and say that most self-styled alt-righters are on the same level as Salafists, well, that's thankfully not the case, otherwise we would've seen way worse than what has happened till now. Comparing Watson to Choudary? Don't make me laugh.
No, I think you are ignorant to the point of stupidity if you think that manifesto was real. The entire thing was written as soundbites for the media to echo far and wide. He even says as much in the damn thing.
As I said before, read it, then watch the actual livestream. No one puts as much thought into this as that guy did, and then performs as poorly as they did when it comes time. And that is without even going into the problems with the logic in the manifesto itself.
Unreason and anti-intellectualism abominate thought. Thinking implies disagreement; and disagreement implies nonconformity; and nonconformity implies heresy; and heresy implies disloyalty — so, obviously, thinking must be stopped. But shouting is not a substitute for thinking and reason is not the subversion but the salvation of freedom. - Adlai Stevenson
For people like Richard Spencer, yes. But, I have a problem with the term alt-right being thrown around so loosely, that I would say no for this poll.
I’m cool with calling all extremist ideologies violent. Muslims, alt-righters, anti-abortion bombers, etc.
Inner city gang culture as well.
Last edited by Rooflesstoofless; 2019-03-15 at 01:55 PM.
what in the hell do any of you plan to do to stop it?
oh, i got it, start plucking the letters off your keyboard so you can throw them at alt righters! that'll teach them
No sense crying over spilt beer, unless you're drunk...
It definitely is real and is the product of conservative rhetoric and delusion echoed by some of most powerful politicians in the US and Australia. Look at what an Australian senator just said moments ago about Islamic followers and immigration. The only difference between the shooter and the politican is that the shooter actually executed conservative rhetoric.
Oh look, it's another leftist fear mongering trash thread. Just a friendly reminder that your ideology killed literally dozens of million.
They have all peddled the same islamophobia and white genocide bullshit theories. These theories are the bedrock of the current far right, and of the shooter in new Zealand. There is absolutely no defending any of them unless you want to be seen as a fascist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BvaJhwAl4E
He seems to sure love white nationalism...
And that goes directly against principles of libertarianism.
- - - Updated - - -
How would you know? You are brand new here.
Maybe you could provide a link to all those other threads about which you are speaking.
Last edited by Machismo; 2019-03-15 at 02:12 PM.
Unreason and anti-intellectualism abominate thought. Thinking implies disagreement; and disagreement implies nonconformity; and nonconformity implies heresy; and heresy implies disloyalty — so, obviously, thinking must be stopped. But shouting is not a substitute for thinking and reason is not the subversion but the salvation of freedom. - Adlai Stevenson
Todays events are exactly why in the UK people like Tommy Robinson have been banned from social media platforms. People peddling hate and violence should be behind bars, it doesn't matter where they are from, what colour their skin is. Hate is hate and terror is terror. Anyone arguing against that belongs there too.