Its REALLY hard to not state bash (not nation bash) Alabama for going 100 years backwards in time. Whats next, lower age of consent to 8?
Have they legalized brother/sister marriages yet?
Its REALLY hard to not state bash (not nation bash) Alabama for going 100 years backwards in time. Whats next, lower age of consent to 8?
Have they legalized brother/sister marriages yet?
PROUD TRUMP SUPPORTER, #2024Trump #MAGA
PROUD TRUMP CAMPAIGN SUPPORTER #SaveEuropeWithTrump
PROUD SUPPORTER OF THE WALL
BLUE LIVES MATTER
NO TO ALL GUNCONTROL OR BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EUROPE
/s
No ,it's not. It does not make sense at all but a lack of a basic understanding of rules of logic from people who want to justify hate is no news to me.
There's not a single sentence about what you wrote that make sense so I'm gonna simplify for you.
This is not about "moral high ground" ...this is about understanting that reasonings that are not coherent ( they contradict themselves) are not reasoning but falacies ( they render and invalid argument).
Be coherent with your statements and you can say there's trees in the moon.
So lets get to it:
Premise 1: Person X says every perspective should be respected.
Premise 2: Person X says gay perspective should not be respected.
Premise 3: Gay perspective is a perspective.
Conclusion: Premises 2 and 3 contradicts Premise 1.
Do I need to put it in propositional formal state or is it that you are a dialetheist and think than logic can have statements that are both true and false? (kidding here).
So i will repeat: it's not about evil or wrong....this is about COHERENCE.
If growing up in the 80's watching He-Man, Thundercats, Silver Hawks, etc didn't make me gay, then no cartoon is ever going to make someone gay. Sitting in front of the tv soaking in all of those bulging, clean shaven muscles wearing little more than a technicolor banana hammock and wrestling other dudes who looked like they were straight out of a Tom of Finland/Judas Priest mashup never had any homoerotic impression on my young mind because, unlike many of you adults, children don't watch these cartoons through a lens of which characters are putting their penises into other characters. Sexualizing cartoons is something that adults do, look at all of the hentai and rule 34 shit, that's purely an adult fixation. Kids see a marriage and they just see two characters getting married, that doesn't manifest into later thoughts of the characters sucking each others dicks or fingering butt holes. This hysteria over a gay marriage making kids gay is entirely unfounded and it's adults with prejudices who have a problem with it and react to it. Stop trying to force children to shoulder your homophobia or sexual discomfort.
Damn some part of this country are so pathetic lmao. Its like watching a time machine inside the time machine most of the US is.
In my opinion, only the adult version was actually bad, which is a spin-off of the original Ren & Stimpy. The original was quite okay. Watched some of it not too long a go.
No, he wasn't. And even if you want to stay within US, 49 state governments did not ban Arthur over this. Alabama's ass-backwards fundamentalist government is in 2% minority here. The population of homosexuals in US is a larger percentage than that. 2% dissent of regressive zealots still doesn't make something a hot button topic.
its a cartoon, damn
and this is supposed to be america. Its an "Armutszeugnis".
Rightwingers: the liberal media are censoring our speakers because they say things they don't like!
Also rightwingers: let's censor a kid's show because it says things we don't like!
A Fetus is not a person under the 14th amendment.
Christians are Forced Birth Fascists against Human Rights who indoctrinate and groom children. Prove me wrong.
Man i'm learning about some really shitty people on this forum lately. Should be ashamed.
As for the ban, literally no one is surprised. I had to stay in that state for a month and I wanted to scream.