On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
Are politicians aiming to have their ideal voter base entirely bad? I mean, in a long term Democrats are very hopeful that as the White American population declines their electoral prospects will rise; thus making the defacto open borders positions make more practical sense.
This sounds like wanting the constituency that supports you to have as much power politically as possible, which is obviously a good political strategy.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
It is just that it seems like it, with how things have been recently, that it seems more vocal than normal case of learn something every day..
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah I am finding that out from the replies I have been getting from my post..
- - - Updated - - -
More a case of not until recently that I have taken notice, as most of the time it is a case of politics being very boring.. And I am probably older than you but not going to worry about that..
- - - Updated - - -
Well that is something that I did not know and it is interesting, that it has been battled over for so long..
That is not the same thing as carving out districts abnormally to hold power, picking your voters is not the same as appealing to a specific demographic you are conflating the two on purpose. One is normal the other goes against the very concept of democracy, if you cannot appeal to a district then perhaps you shouldn't be running or maybe change the issues you address.
When it means gerrymandering and fighting to disenfranchise groups, as has become the republican way? Yes. A thousand times yes.
Incorrect. Your supposition that, because fewer non-whites vote republican, that democrats must therefore dislike white people voting, is a poorly drawn conclusion.I mean, in a long term Democrats are very hopeful that as the White American population declines their electoral prospects will rise; thus making the defacto open borders positions make more practical sense.
It's ensuring that everyone has appropriate representation.This sounds like wanting the constituency that supports you to have as much power politically as possible, which is obviously a good political strategy.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
The entire premise of this entire thing is to keep power to a dying ideology and i am sure the democrats would do something similar if they were the ones losing out to the changing demographics. Population growth among whites is in decline and likely will continue on that path for a myriad of reasons without any real fixes that are not easy to implement at a fast enough pace. NAFTA should have had a freedom of labor movement provision to allow those who work seasonally in fields and such to come and earn money for their family back home or whatever.
It is also not a shock that gerrymandering is the new poll tax problem. How hard would it to have a non partisan group to actual draw the maps? If your ideology goes against the words on the statue of liberty perhaps you should rethink your ideology.
Maybe, maybe not.
But we need to deal with real problems, not hypothetical ones that absolve real people orchestrating real problems of the blame they're due.
No "solution" is needed. The reason "white people" are disappearing is because of America's low birthrate and the notion that a white person having a child with a non-white person then lends a child that's deemed "not white" in the eyes of many.Population growth among whites is in decline and likely will continue on that path for a myriad of reasons without any real fixes that are not easy to implement at a fast enough pace.
Neither of those things can be "fixed" save for white people marrying other white people and having lots of children. And you can't, or rather, shouldn't, force those things to happen.
Trump is not interested in a functioning international trade system; how would such a thing benefit him, personally? It wont. Ergo, he doesn't care. The result of his policies are immaterial to him; it's the message of his policies he cares about because that's what his constituency cares about.NAFTA should have had a freedom of labor movement provision to allow those who work seasonally in fields and such to come and earn money for their family back home or whatever.
It wouldn't be difficult in the least.It is also not a shock that gerrymandering is the new poll tax problem. How hard would it to have a non partisan group to actual draw the maps?
The ease of implementation, however, is not the issue. The GOP retains an unfortunate amount of power right now, and they know that redistricting royally hampers their ability to get reelected. Hence why they'll oppose fair redistricting at every turn.
They don't care about such things; that's the problem.If your ideology goes against the words on the statue of liberty perhaps you should rethink your ideology.
Their voters might, and maybe a handful of their congressmen do; but sadly, they're duped into believing that their personal beliefs are represented by the GOP at large.
Last edited by Kaleredar; 2019-06-02 at 10:00 AM.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
It is more vocal,and rightfully so. It shows the disparity in voting power between people. it's our country's oldest form of affirmative action. People seem to think there's no other way to do it, yet we get it do e at every other level of government, as well as almost every other government on the planet. Our model is inconsistent, and is forced imequality.
"If you are ever asking yourself 'Is Trump lying or is he stupid?', the answer is most likely C: All of the Above" - Seth Meyers
It still amazes me how you don't have an independent electoral commission which runs free of administrative oversight.
Stuff like this stops being an issue.
"If you are ever asking yourself 'Is Trump lying or is he stupid?', the answer is most likely C: All of the Above" - Seth Meyers