And exactly how does burning down Teldrassil and crippling an entire army play into her master plan? In no way does she fall into this "evil with a good heart" archetype. Her actions are self-serving--she doesn't care about anyone or anything else.
And exactly how does burning down Teldrassil and crippling an entire army play into her master plan? In no way does she fall into this "evil with a good heart" archetype. Her actions are self-serving--she doesn't care about anyone or anything else.
I think I'm getting sick of people empowering other people everywhere, it has gotten out of hands. That's even weirder for Sylvanas which has had no interaction at all with her "powerful ally", she never used any relic or artifact to grant her power. She just gets them out of thin air because why not. Every single empowered baddie in the past had an artifact or an actual physical interaction to gain power (except Gul'dan maybe ?).
Plus, the power gainz were always limited to be reasonable. With Sylvanas it is ridiculous, I'm only expecting a ridiculous ending to this shitshow, either she will die a stupid death from her own arrogance, or we will become demigod or full-god to defeat her with another kamehameha coming from the Power of Friendship™.
Remember when Bwonsamdi's gift to Rastakhan only made him jump high and throw one punch to Zul, not even knocking him down ? Yeah
I do not share the OP's faith in Sylvanas' ability to be altruistic. She is basically mortal evil incarnate at this stage...
Not entirely. She desperately wanted to have her sisters become undead so they could be together forever. But she couldn't do it her love for them outweighed her selfish desire.
Thats her motivation and why she would burn the world of the living to save the world of the dead. The thought of her family suffering in eternal torment a torment she has already experienced is driving her.
What are the lives of mortals when compared to the eternal suffering and damnation of everyone in the multiverse for all of eternity?
Is it better to kill no one and do nothing knowing they will be damned for eternity or to sacrifice thousands to spare them and everyone else from the Maw?
I love that that lead story designer will be forever known as a creepy neckbeard m'lady.
Also if blizzard plans on giving sylvanas a redemption arc, which they shouldn't after all crap she did. But say they will.
Ill quote Deputy U.S. Marshal Samuel Gerard from the fugitive: "I don't care".
Great now i want Tyrande to do the fugitive speech.
I get the distinct impression that she wanted to kill them so they'd be out of her way. But she didn't either because 1) she retained some feeling for them or 2) knew that killing them would make things a lot more complicated for her.
They're only "damned for eternity" if they're evil monsters like Arthas or, apparently, her.Thats her motivation and why she would burn the world of the living to save the world of the dead. The thought of her family suffering in eternal torment a torment she has already experienced is driving her.
What are the lives of mortals when compared to the eternal suffering and damnation of everyone in the multiverse for all of eternity?
Is it better to kill no one and do nothing knowing they will be damned for eternity or to sacrifice thousands to spare them and everyone else from the Maw?
I really don't buy any "altruistic" angle from Sylvanas. Frankly, she's way too much of a petulant bitch.
She doesn't have the gravitas (or writing) of someone serving a higher purpose other than her own ends.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Because she needed to send them to hell so she could get more power so she could be powerful enough to beat the jailer and save the whole afterlife as well as the universe and become queen of the Shadowlands.
Come on, EVERYONE can see this coming right?
Before expansion ends even Tyrande will be shedding a tear for Sylvanas and how selfless she was killing all those elves to be able to save their souls
BASIC CAMPFIRE for WARCHIEF UK Prime Minister!
For the love that is all unholy I hope that is not going to happen. With Illidan it mostly made sense, but Sylvannas is totally selfish (Well at least I view her like that) and it wouldn't make sense for the story...but then again, I really worry after she said "I will set US ...."
Here's a fact: most players aren't that ferventely loyal to one faction to the point of being unable to like a character on the other. That's how most "Alliance" and "Horde" players are, to the point that they can be barely be associated to one faction to begin with (despite favoring one for countless factors, sometimes not even related to the lore). The "Alliance" and "Horde" players that develop a solid partisanship are nothing but a barely relevant minority compared to the entirety of the playerbase.
I really don't see where people get that. Yes, Illidan is indeed popular but also considered a poor man's edgy anti-hero by several others after his Legion comeback, and before that was considered little more than a total waste all the way back to TBC. The bulk of the Illidan's relevance was almost entirely tied to his shining moments in WC3 and a lot of time has passed since then. On the other hand, Sylvanas has grown more and more relevant to the main plot and managed to do so by even escaping the villain bat (for now).
I could've said the same with Sylvanas, she was much better in Wc3. Illidan at least got a few good moments in the Legion, so I guess after his "I'm my scars" his fanbase grew much larger than it was before(and I think it was really huge back then). Of course the Dark Lady also had nice moments, but they were nothing compared to the Stormrage.
We can just speculate, but it's impossible to say which one had larger fan-base, we could've just made a poll on this forum and still the result wouldn't be trustworthy...
Gets posted pretty often here, especially accompanying criticism of WoW's story or specific criticism of the developers. You can see them here.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
This is unfortunately what i think will be the biggest detractor to any developments she gets in this upcoming expansion. It's *somewhat* Thrall/Green Jesus all over again.
I like her character, i liked it much more before they made her a flippant tantrum throwing, moustache twirling cartoon villain. But having her as the central focus for basically all story development shown in game for now going on 3 expansions is... too much..
I agree, but it's become something of a meme as they say nowadays. There's an NPC in WoW named Moorgard based on him, who's basically besotted with a Dark Ranger who wants nothing to do with him. It's stupid and funny, not really something to get up in arms about, IMO.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Then why was her original plan to kill Malfurion and capture Darnassus, ensuing dominance in Kalimdor, light or no retaliation and Alliance retreating? It was Saurfang who botched this plan, which caused Sylv to declare "plan B, fuck the tree". Had he not done that, there would be way less bloodshed and casualities, no burning of Teldrassil, no Siege of Undercity, quite likely no events of BfA. Was Saurfang in on all this after all?