Are they? Can you show that, please? Please link the parts of each source that run back to the NYTimes article. We'll wait.
Also, we're looking forward to the evidence that the story isn't correct. We'll accept half the amount of sources we provided, rounded down, because we all know you need the help.
I'm sure it gets enough turnips without you all feeding it.
/s
You have to be a complete fucking idiot to believe this, if it were true the Taliban would admit it outright, those guys don't give a single fuck what America thinks, also Russia wants USA to be there wasting monies + taking care of a terrorist problem Russia is unwilling to deal with themselves..
If you can't tell this is just orange man bad election rhetoric..
I swear if someone wrote Trump murders babies on Mars, there will be a few on here that'll believe it
No wonder putin got nearly 2 more decades as president, he's made our president his little bitch. And Trumpers agree with trump that intelligence can't be trusted because they are not smart enough to be able to differentiate between what intelligence is, and what a fact is.
Clam everyone does it
Claim everyone is "just is as bad"
Dispute the claim
Dispute the definition of one or more words
Dispute facts
Dispute reality
Claim baseless alternative definitions, facts, reality
Claim someone else is responsible for the thing you disputed the reality of
Claim you were framed by hostile third parties
Change the subject
Bring up Obama
Cycle as needed
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
Still waiting for proof and not "well, because we say so!"
The point was to not use a counter example at all; to not derail the thread. I get that you don't get it. Well actually I expect that you do get it. You're just playing your usual misdirection/move the goal post game. As always, you've got everyone fooled buddy, everyone!
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah, pretty much.
What is your personal "goalpost" for this thread that you feel have been moved by me? Trump bashing? There is entire separate thread for that.
Mine is getting some juicy spy drama bits, and i'm getting that - though slowly and sadly with not enough detail.
And additionally educating some people when they happen to be wrong. That is always a bonus.
As far as i'm concerned premise of this thread could be entirely true and it wouldn't change a thing for me - or, likely, Russia as a whole. You're already sanctioning GRU for previous election interference, there aren't many non-symbolic options left to get them hurting more.
Last edited by Shalcker; 2020-07-02 at 11:04 AM.
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
Also, this is projecting, supporting terrorists as proxy is a US thing, (Muhajeddin 1980s Afghanistan)
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi