Freedom of speech as it relates to the first amendment is more about whether the government can take action against you for speech, not whether non-government entities should be forced to continue offering their association to parties they have fundamental disagreements with.
Last I checked, Amazon, Google, Apple, Twitter et al isn't the US government, they're not obligated to offer a megaphone to everyone and their dog.
That said, I'm sceptical to whether dodging a ban on social media by simply creating a new account would constitute a crime, as you're not strictly hacking into someone else's account or the back-end of the systems, which are things you can be prosecuted for, but the platform holder is by no means obligated to continue offering their services to people getting suspensions and bans, or having their website taken off the hosting service.
This is where we circle around to right-wingers' real complaint, which is about capitalism. Which, y'know, as a market socialist myself, I get. But when you point this out to them, they get super upset with you.
So I'm just gonna point it out again; if you've got a problem with these tech companies being too big and having too much sway, your issue isn't with freedom of speech. Your issue is with capitalism as an economic system.
- - - Updated - - -
Speaking as someone with little to no social media presence professionally (I'm old enough that I prefer being a private individual), who's nevertheless written and published work that's been read internationally, you really don't have any clue what you're talking about, dude.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/11/capi...ges-in-dc.html
DC AG looking into riot incitement charges against Donnie JR, Giuliani, and Mo Brooks.
https://bangordailynews.com/2021/01/...d-the-capitol/
Shitheel Susan Collins on the events of Wednesday -
She thought Y'all Qeda was the Iranians. Trying to accept that members of your own party came to try to kill you must be hard.My first thought was that the Iranians had followed through on their threat to strike the Capitol, but a police officer took over the podium and explained that violent demonstrators had breached the entire perimeter of the Capitol and were inside.
Actions have consequences.National veterans groups plan to purge members found guilty in Capitol attack
https://webcache.googleusercontent.c...&ct=clnk&gl=us
Because what's posted on twitter, stays on twitter. Right?
Hasanabi is now friends with a member of congress solely because of his popular leftist live stream on twitch after just two years. How many books do you think he'd have to write to reach the same result?
Countless political personalities from all sides of the spectrum have gone from being a nobody to being a celebrity from streams, videos, and posts in the last five years. This greatly outpaces writing books and appearing on tv shows.
Last edited by docterfreeze; 2021-01-11 at 09:40 PM.
Can we take the freedom of speech stuff to the Deplatform thread?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...box=1610386368"Armed protests are being planned at all 50 state capitols from 16 January through at least 20 January, and at the US Capitol from 17 January through 20 January," the bulletin reportedly states.
There is a large difference between ostracizing a company (which certainly can be "killed") and cutting off all ways of retreat for human beings. Of course you can choose who to have in your life, but in this case the other side influences your life simply by existing. Even (especially) an ostracized individual can push for some weird ass politics.
Nationalize MMO-C and force it to keep all posts. What's posted on MMO-C stays on MMO-C, right?
Is that the livestream guy who dunks on conservatives? So he became friends with a member of Congress through Twitter. Does that mean if I befriend a member of Congress at a local bar the local bar now has to be treated like you want Twitter to be treated?
Yes and? What does that have to do with the Constitution?