Utilities have to be that way. Or you'll end up with a situation like texas during febuary. Or you'll have people paying 50% of their paycheck for water.
Also that services that aren't part of a market in the first place can't really be construed as "monopolies" to begin with. It's like claiming that police departments are a "monopoly".
Or, you mean like government-backed monopolies like PG&E? I see we're back at the beginning.
Glad you are admitting utilizes are best to be public instead of privatized. Why though, are you supporting socialism? I thought you libertarians loved privatization and free markets?
Also that services that aren't part of a market in the first place can't really be construed as "monopolies" in the first place. It's like claiming that police departments are a "monopoly".
It’s yet another term Machismo doesn’t understand.
I mean, I couldn't even get people to entertain the thought of not increasing government spending.
- - - Updated - - -
Originally Posted by Endus
Also that services that aren't part of a market in the first place can't really be construed as "monopolies" to begin with. It's like claiming that police departments are a "monopoly".
Glad you are admitting utilizes are best to be public instead of privatized. Why though, are you supporting socialism? I thought you libertarians loved privatization and free markets?
Flint would like to have a chat.
- - - Updated - - -
Originally Posted by Ivanstone
Irrelevant. Answer the question. Or do you not actually know how capitalism deals with a monopoly?
Its not a straw man. You like capitalism. You don't like monopolies. I'm of the opinion that capitalism will always default to monopolies. If you disagree explain why I'm wrong.
Its not a straw man. You like capitalism. You don't like monopolies. I'm of the opinion that capitalism will always default to monopolies. If you disagree explain why I'm wrong.
Yep, so maybe you should ask me to back up the things I say, not the things you say.
There, now you can stop with the narrative that I don't support any government or regulations.
I never claimed otherwise, you didn't read my post, did you? You just said nope and be done with it. Awkward.
Originally Posted by ash
So, look um, I'm not a grief counselor, but if it's any consolation, I have had to kill and bury loved ones before. A bunch of times actually.
Originally Posted by PC2
I never said I was knowledge-able and I wouldn't even care if I was the least knowledge-able person and the biggest dumb-ass out of all 7.8 billion people on the planet.
There, now you can stop with the narrative that I don't support any government or regulations.
Is there a country with some government and low spending that doesn't look like Venezuela, Yemen, Ethiopia, or Syria?
Populists (and "national socialists") look at the supposedly secret deals that run the world "behind the scenes". Child's play. Except that childishness is sinister in adults.
Well, its good we agree that regulations are not marketing, and that I do support government.
So that's it. Not going to explain your shit. Good, good. So my post stands as what your position is and will lead to, thanks for playing.
Hypocrite
Originally Posted by ash
So, look um, I'm not a grief counselor, but if it's any consolation, I have had to kill and bury loved ones before. A bunch of times actually.
Originally Posted by PC2
I never said I was knowledge-able and I wouldn't even care if I was the least knowledge-able person and the biggest dumb-ass out of all 7.8 billion people on the planet.