Something interesting going on behind the scenes in the EU:
https://www.politico.eu/article/euro...ice-karlsruhe/
This needs some context:Last year, Germany’s highest court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, ruled that the Court of Justice of the European Union had overstepped its bounds in granting the ECB carte blanche to undertake a controversial policy of buying member states’ debt, an emergency measure the bank implemented during Europe’s debt crises to keep the euro from collapsing.
The German court (often referred to simply as “Karlsruhe” after the city where it’s based) ruled that the Bundesbank, the largest central bank in the euro area, could not be permitted to participate in the bond purchase programs unless the ECB could show they were really necessary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intern...d_Futtermittel
It references two famous court cases dealing with the question of who has the last word. The first ruling (Solange I) states "Provisionally, therefore, in the hypothetical case of a conflict between Community law and... the guarantees of fundamental rights in the Constitution... the guarantee of fundamental rights in the Constitution prevails as long as the competent organs of the Community have not removed the conflict of norms in accordance with the Treaty mechanism." while the second ruling (Solange II) revised the position as such:
"In view of these developments, it must be held that, so long as the European Communities, and in particular the case law of the European Court, generally ensure an effective protection of fundamental rights as against the sovereign powers of the Communities which is to be regarded as substantially similar to the protection of fundamental rights required unconditionally by the Constitution, and in so far as they generally safeguard the essential content of fundamental rights, the Federal Constitutional Court will no longer exercise its jurisdiction to decide on the applicability of secondary Community legislation cited as the legal basis for any acts of German civil courts or authorities within the sovereign jurisdiction of the Federal Republic of Germany, and it will no longer review such legislation by the standard of the fundamental rights contained in the Constitution."
In short: The German constitutional court has naturally assumed (as should every national court) that the last authority lies with the German national court, including the supervision of the international ECJ in Luxembourg and the only reason why it's not exercising said authority is because the ECJ has a working human rights framework to ensure just rulings. However, it retained the authority to supervise and rule on EU matters if it finds EU law to violate national constitutional war.
It is a bit complicated in what exactly is going on, but this is such an interesting case popping up right now that it's a great starting point for people to get into how the EU works and how the relationship between the EU and member states work. the article is well worth reading.