I benefit from the ditches that need to be dug. And if I'm good at cleaning toilets, why wouldn't I? Hell, I have helped friends install toilets. So much for your argument, I guess.
- - - Updated - - -
When you insist that people will not work without financial recompense, that's what you're arguing.
Don't go moving goalposts now, when you realize you can't defend that point.
Great, can you clean out my septic tank, then?
It may take a while, how's the next 30 years of your life sound? Alas, there won't be any pay in it for you, but you will get to be proud of the work you're doing. Sure you could just sit at home and play Xbox, and have the exact same things in life.
Your choice.
My argument is the rich should pay their fucking taxes. They and their sycophants should stop whining.
Others have said that a wealth tax is onerous but have yet to provide a real world counterexample. There are countries that have wealth tax. They have billionaires living in them.
Well, we have the real-life attempts... those went badly.
We have basic human behavior... which isn't on your side.
- - - Updated - - -
Enjoy!!!
https://taxfoundation.org/summary-of...ta-2020-update
That's what happens when people don't actually bother to learn the difference between wealth and income.
America is the best example of capitalism... if you want to look to other countries you begin to go down the shitter real quick...
Around the world when you compare developing capitalist to socialist countries the socialist ones have always performed better on life expectancy, food security, housing, jobs, education...
- - - Updated - - -
The pro business conservative right wing tax foundation says the rich pay enough!!!! Colour me shocked.The Tax Foundation describes itself as an "independent tax policy research organization".[1] They are cited in the media as a nonpartisan or bipartisan organization,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and are also described as business-friendly, conservative, and center-right
You realize the alternative you're suggesting is that it's "better" for some poor disadvantaged person without other options to be effectively forced by duress into taking that septic-tank-cleaning position for just over minimum wage, and to do that job for 30 years for that shit pay, barely getting by, because they have no other real options in life, and can't make any different choices, can't just choose to quit and stay home even though they hate the work and how poorly its paid, because they need to keep a roof over their family's heads and food on the table.
You're arguing that without that duress, people won't do the work. You don't see the inherent problem in that argument?
https://www.propublica.org/article/l...ree-piggy-bank
TLDR:
*Noted shit bird Peter Thiel is also engaging in tax evasion.
*"Thiel also had an advantage over most Americans with IRAs, who typically use them to purchase publicly traded stocks, bonds, mutual funds and certificates of deposit. Since Thiel used his Roth to buy shares of a private company, the value wasn’t set on a public stock exchange."
This is the "freedom and individual liberty" capitalist love to talk about. Never mind the fact garbagemen are generally quite pleased with their jobs... some people like Machismo inject prestige into jobs and deem certain ones beneath them. Oh god it's the same mentality on Wall Street.
Social democracy... you mean when states try to expand socialist and communist party ideas? You know the ones that got backed and implemented over the years? You know the countries where they didn't actively hunt, kill, jail, and overthrow every single leftist leader unlike the USA?
The USA doesn't have social democracy simply because they went hard with stomping out leftists.
So what you're telling me is that the mixed socialist ideals into capitalism is good yet you take issue with communism?
Can't. There's so much shit to post! Have I mentioned that anti-journalism zealot Peter Thiel did a bad thing?