Seems rather weird, for it to be fake.
If it were fake, I'd imagine they would have pictured the object to be a rock, or a brick. Making a fake story on how you were hit by a dildo, just doesn't garner much sympathy, and certainly not when you also claim concussion. Makes it sound like you were target of a practical joke, and you being a crybaby about it.
I'd say this is real. It's too stupid and counter-productive for it to be fake.
Someone could have just taken pictures of a dildo and slapped Ngo's twitter handle on it. It's not like anyone has actually linked his tweet, and screenshots are trivially easy to fake.
Ngo's problem is that it's believable because he's such a pathetic whiny piece of shit when it comes to all things Antifa/BLM.
And yet another unjustifiable murder.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...ander-79601887
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
I thought we had enough experience with what comes from investigations before saying “unjustifiable” and “murder.” Why be convinced that the officer intended to kill bystanders, and that every injured or killed bystander should be judged unjustifiable?
It’s like the reverse psychopathy of people inclined to blame victims of police shootings for their actions prior to being shot.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time." "So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Maybe not murder but this is definitely manslaughter via reckless disregard for life. Unless there is evidence(and no not the officers word of he swore the guy had a gun) that the suspect was a true valid danger to the officer and everyone around then there is no justifiable reason for the officer to shoot let alone pull out his gun to arrest him. Police in the U.S. are trained to treat any and all situations as a threat that is life or death.
https://www.theatlantic.com/national...rguson/383681/They learn that every encounter, every individual, is a potential threat. They always have to be on their guard because, as cops often say, “complacency kills.”
So it is drilled into police that to survive they need to shoot first and ask questions later because better the person they shoot then them no matter if the person they shoot are innocent or not. Unless the suspect went full action movie henchmen cliche and pulled out his gun to shoot the officer the second he saw him then the officer had no real justifiable reason to have his gun out. He should have called for backup and followed him to then arrest him in order to take him in alive to be tried for his alleged crimes. It is the utter failing of the training police are given and as a country we praise them that every situation needs to be met with a gun or violence especially when that gun ends the life of a completely innocent bystander.
That cop really just stomped on that guys head to subdue him, and then found no evidence of illegal activity. Wow.
Yes, well...
He got his.When Gailyard couldn’t immediately lie flat on his stomach, Dukes stomped on his head and neck, causing his forehead to hit the concrete of the parking lot, according to body camera video.
Dukes was fired two days after the incident and charged with felony first-degree assault and battery a few days after that.
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils