I'm sure this will be perfectly unbiased and not at all misused by fragile snowflakes and other thin skinned people... The rules about harassment and abuse will be equally enforced no matter the ethnicity, orientation or other preference/liking that may apply.
Right?
Surely?
I see a lot of "Me being an asshole is not really me being an asshole, y'all are just thin skinned snowflakes" going around here.
I see MMO-C has not changed even a little.
Or the classic "Toxicity isn't real. I'm not toxic. It's those bads who can't play as good as me, no, those are the real toxic ones. I'm the one who's helping them by insulting them! Snowflakes just don't know!"
Last edited by Otimus; 2022-05-31 at 01:07 AM.
I can see a world were in low keys people go in group dies three times in less then three minutes then people rage report the guy who leaves the doomed endeavor.
I'm afraid blizzard is dumb enough to try and apply a leaver penalty to mythic plus much like dota games have.
Well, back then we weren't vindictive little children who thought the only way to deal with it was to retaliate in every way we possibly could. We got annoyed, we went and did something else we enjoyed. Then we came back later and enjoyed it again.
It's people like you who think they have to "win" at everything or they've let the entire country down.
How joyous to be in such a place! Where phishing is not only allowed, it is encouraged!
It's amazing how you thought what you posted was in any way what i said. It's not even close to making sense.
I'm making fun of the POSTER for wanting to WIN (as in thinking logging of is him "showing them") not whatever you thought.
How someone could get something so wrong from what i wrote is amazing and a much bigger let down to the country then what you said :P
They forgot to mention the new gear item, brown armbands.
You know there was a time when acting the wrong way could result in the church either sending you to prison, exiling you to some unsettled land, or just outright having you killed. It wasn't new then and it isn't new now. Turn around take a long hard look at your government.
Now we'll see people entangle others cleverly into being reported such as the collective that resides on the Blizzard forums. This is dangerous and there's a select few who will use this as a weapon to oust others. What gets to me is that this is borderline fascism. By even saying that I'd get reported but the context is quite innocent and wary of the many pitfalls involved in controlling the views of others.
I get that being toxic and abusive is not healthy, but who creates the ruleset? Who oversees what is toxic and abusive? To what end do we draw a line in the sand and say enough? The Nazis went from bashing communists to killing anyone that wasn't a conformist to the Nazi party in a very short time. Here I am, using historical context but even the mention of these words gives someone a chance to report me and offer me up as their prize simply because they can not because they should. All so they can feel empowered by punishing a complete stranger. I see this all the time on forums and I feel that there's not going to be a good result from all this.
WoW is mostly played by a generation that is thick-skinned and knows that sticks and stones break their bones, names never harm them. There's a very small minority who is the most vocal, wanting to be wrapped in cotton wool. Not a good thing for all parties.
Last edited by zysis; 2022-05-31 at 06:07 PM.
SOCIAL CONTRACTS ARE COMMUNISM
If Blizz had simply called it a "Friendly Gamer Agreement Forum" then there would be no correlation, right? Maybe, but still Blizz choose to call it a "Social Contract". So they know. Now we know.
If this wasn't what Blizz had in mind then they need to pull it and consider some edits.
This. As the descendant of a Kossack who was forced to walk to China when communism took over, I see this whole thing as yet another time when Blizzard acts on the voices of the very small minority without considering the broader implications. Reporting toxic abusive players has always been there. This feels like a litmus test which is giving these minorities the feeling of empowerment over the many who simply do not agree with their views.
What counts as poor behavior? Do I have to indulge the fantasies of the mentally ill?
Fanboy (Fanboi):
1. A term used towards someone when a person disagrees with the said someone on a subject, person, place, thing, company, or product line and they are not smart enough to debate their counterpoints or facts, so they resort to childish name calling in hopes of shaming others into silence and thus them winning through dominance.* 2. A term used as a taunt/peer pressure technique to shape popular opinion through shame and humiliation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract
Social contract goes back to the Age of Enlightenment in the 18th century.
The term has been used for plenty of things. It is not strictly a communist thing whatsoever. If you look for mentions of capitalism, you can see its been used there too. Gasp.
Irrespective of whether or not that's actually the case (and what you provided to back this claim is specious and reductive), you're making a crucial mistake here by equating "THE social contract" (a very specific concept in moral philosophy originated in 17th/18th century Enlightenment thinking, most importantly Rousseau's 1762 treatise "The Social Contract") with "social contractS", a generic term for various forms of community agreements.
Those are not the same thing.
Good way to get people to stop communicating in game