Literally the definition of misanthropy.
It's not normal, dude.
I don't accept the abusive and harmful ideology you're pushing, and that said ideology is rooted in suffering and ignorance.Just say you don't like people like me and get over it.
This isn't personal. I don't know you. I can only characterize and criticise the arguments you put forward. "Liking" doesn't enter into the equation.
It really isn't nitpicky. A hell of the lot of the labor people do is not considered "work", because we're not paid to do it. Cleaning your own house, maintaining your lawn, shopping for groceries and other supplies, commuting, rearing your children, and so on. It'd be "work" if you paid someone else to do it for you, but it isn't "work" if you're doing it for yourself. Not in sociological/economic terms. Which is what we're discussing, here.Tomayto/tomaato. I'm not nitpicking what humans do for bare minimum survival versus what they do to get higher up the food chain. Besides that, you're still not advocating for humans to have to do their "chores" either, and still get a free ride. because YOU think it's "easy enough" for strong people to just altruistically dedicate their strength. Nah. Pass.
And yes; I'm advocating for empathic support of those in need. And yes; it's dead fucking easy for a rich person to pay taxes to cover those needs. The easiest thing in the world. There's no need for them to do so altruistically, at all. That's why there's a tax system.
You really need to look into events like the Holodomor. "Hunting down" is not a requirement for genocide; letting people die off is all it takes to qualify as a genocide.Biggest difference between me and those people is I won't hunt down people to exterminate them, nor propose doing such a thing.
You are literally and definitively advocating for genocide, as if it were "good". In much the same phrasing and rhetoric as the worst tyrants and human rights abusers of history.
This is an intellectually bankrupt straw man.If you think automation can provide everything all the current humans need to keep their current lifestyles or even just basic necessities without a single human having to do actual labor you're quite frankly stupid. We're nowhere near that yet.
Ask yourself this: if all humans stopped working *tomorrow* what would we be without? How much less stuff do you think would be available?
No one is suggesting nobody would work. Plenty of people want to work. We're simply discussing an economy that doesn't abuse those who don't want to work, and is balanced to optimize things for the workers, rather than the fatcat owners at the top, who produce nothing and take everything.