Yeah, this goes back to what I was saying before. I don't think the judge, who was clearly being personally attacked in public, should lose any rights just because Jones is currently in her courtroom. I mean, suing him right now might be considered too aggressive, but Jones is giving her every chance. Perhaps when the case has left her courtroom for good.
Or, that could just be contempt of court.
Seriously, you can't just broadcast to public that someone is a child trafficker and advocate violence against them and expect to get away with it. It shouldn't be grounds for appeal, either, because otherwise every guilty defendant would do it literally every time.
"We, the jury, find you guilty of murdering fifty-seven baby seals in a Taco Bell."
"Ah, but remember that time I called the judge a fucking cunt on Twitter? Clearly that made her biased against me."
"No, the fact that you were on camera and were seen by twenty witnesses--"
"I DEMAND AN APPEAL! In front of a judge I pre-emptively call a fucking cunt!"