Not if he is allowed to abuse the system and get unfair treatment that allowed him to make all that money. If he was able to access and continue to this day access ways to avoid what most other companies have to comply with.
If his success and you said, comes at the harm of others...then no i don't support it at all
Buh Byeeeeeeeeeeee !!
Combining a whole suite of disparate questions as if they were one thing isn't particularly honest.
1> I support the right of individuals to start a company.
2> I do not support the right of individuals to own the means of production as private property.
3> I do support the capability for individuals to profit off a company's success. Edit: With the caveat that you shouldn't be forgetting #2 when trying to understand what I'm saying, here.
Three separate things, and pretending they're all part of the same question is pretty unreasonable.
Buh Byeeeeeeeeeeee !!
Nope he was able to make more money from abusing the system and pushing to create new rules for his company because of his leverage on govt officials and the ability to afford accountants who could find and assist him with being able to avoid things like taxes.
Not sure why you keep harping on the fact that people shop at amazon while not supporting everything amazon does.
No one said it was a 101% evil company doing 120% wrong things and does nothing right.
They/We/Govt needs to correct a bunch of things that allow them to abuse the entire system.
Buh Byeeeeeeeeeeee !!
I have never hidden that I oppose the capitalist model of economics. I've been pretty openly outspoken about that, actually. This is not a "gotcha" moment for you.
The capitalist model involves restricting the liberties of workers so that their productivity can be exploited for profit by the capitalists. So yes; I oppose that form of exploitation and loss of liberty.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi