Unfortunately, you're both missing the point.
They'll absolutely do that. And then they'll wait with bated breath for anyone outside the fascist cult to call them out, and then they'll laugh at you for being silly, because of course they take a different stance, it's obvious that they should, because consistency would work against them seizing more power, and everything about their political ideology is about securing power.
That's something they want you to waste time chasing, thinking you can shame them back in line by pointing it out, because they know they have no shame, and you wasting time like that is half the point of doing it. It makes sure you're wasting all your time trying to reason them back over the line, and they know they won't listen to "reason", because they believe.
It's bait. It's a distraction, like Boris Johnson's crazy hair, because when you're so focused on the distraction, you miss the fascist threat behind it.
What's more abnormal is with all the names and evidence confiscated by the police that only Epstein and Maxwell are being held accountable. They didn't have a pedophile ring for themselves even Prince Andrew is not facing jail time. We have Bill Clinton, Trump, Bill Gates, Chris Tucker, Bobby Kotick etc etc, but nope not one pip about criminal charges or even outing them officially.
The second Epstein was out of the picture I am sure another facilitator stepped in for these rich pervs and it's all being buried.
Circumstantial evidence is just fine for criminal convictions.
Seriously, awful TV cop/law dramas have lied to you about basic shit like this. Like, if you've got a murder scene, and there's blood from two people, the victim and someone else, and the victim has a bloody knife in their hand with the other person's blood on it, and there's a bloody handprint on the wall that doesn't match the victim's but gives you full fingerprints to work with, and the victim wrote a name on the floor in their own blood before dying, and all that evidence points to her husband who was cheating on her with his secretary and his wife was threatening to divorce him and take half their stuff with her, literally all of that evidence I just listed off is "circumstantial". Every single bit. And it's gonna be way more than enough to convict.
Just to add to that. A single piece of circumstantial evidence is often insufficient... because there's a plausible alternative explanation for that evidence. It's when you start piling up all the circumstantial evidence that those alternative explanations become less and less plausible. The fingerprint on the window, the DNA on the glass, the bloody shirt found in your trash, the witness that puts you in the general area, etc... all of those things that, by themselves, could be explained away enough to allow for reasonable doubt. Add them all together and reasonable doubt starts to slip away.
Frankly I'm not even sure why her opinion is even needed on this. Investigate and reveal.
The Duke of York and Virginia Giuffre have reached a “settlement in principle” in the civil sex claim filed in the US.
So much for wanting his day in court.
It wasn't long ago that Guiffre said that it was about being vindicated via the legal system and not about money. Maybe she wasn't anticipating £12 million.
Mom's helping foot the bill. She probably wants everything with His Royal Pederast done and over with. "It's horribly embarrassing for the queen mum." someone will probably say instead of commenting how her son is a likes em illegally young and or about... is rapee a word?
I believe there has been some vagueness in the statements, suggesting that it is possible that most of the money goes to her charity for abuse victims, but she might also gets some part herself (the lawyer seems to have worked pro-bono) - but we don't know.
I'm not saying that she actually 'gained' anything - just that she was possibly personally compensated for the crimes.
It's also possible that the charity gets everything.