The people behind the campaign to get you to believe this are being investigated for fraud.
About 20 years ago, I had winter/snow November-February, we had spring only once (if you get my meaning xD), we had more or less hot summers and again, pretty normal, rainy autumns.
Now I get 20C in mid January, 5C in late April, I haven't seen snow for longer than 1-2 days for years.
Whether there's global warming or freezing or whatever the fck is going in...it's going on xD
You probably won't be astounded to hear that both terms, climate change and global warming, have been used for a long time (more than 50 years at this point). People's local climates will be changing, the average global temperature will be increasing.
Global cooling was the subject of a few papers that were considered and found wanting 40 years ago. The only people bringing it up anymore are political hacks who are trying to confuse you.
The Bible didn't mention the Global Warning so I don't have to worry about it.
THat's why I chose to mention both, just to show that I don't care how you call it.
The only thing I truly know is how it has been and how it is now.
Way different.
On the other hand, I try to be open minded, so I leave some % for it to be a part of some normal cycle.
However, this is less likely to me (with current info) since it's a short period of time and I haven't seen any info yet about, i.e., North Pole's continuous natural decline and rise of ice, area wise.
And that's only one part.
Like I said, my father had lots of snow, I had lots of snow as a kid. Now, 20 years later, we see snow for few days, tops.
No it's not. If you only account for natural factors, the Earth should be stable or even cooling at the moment. But it's not. Not only are humans affecting the climate, we're affecting so drastically as to reverse the natural trend. Let that sink in.
https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/i...an-natural.png
I guess it's semantics and I may be incorrect about the correct verbiage, but the way I've generally heard the terms used is as "global warming" referring to the statistical phenomenon of the average temperature of the Earth climbing with climate change more broadly referring to changes in local weather patterns, ocean acidification, and other effects that are related to (but not necessarily caused by) global warming.
This doesn't really matter much though - it's not like one term is nefarious and/or wrong and the other one is right. They're both fine.
No problem. In one of my posts, I also said that I like to have an open mind and that I'm prepared to accept it's a part of a cycle, so to speak.
THe reason why it doesn't seem to me is probably a mixture of: truth, my (lack of) information, what I've been through and logic thinking that can unfortunely be biased just because I may not have certain crucial information.
Global warming does not disclude local weather outliers where it might get cold. Again, it's averages.
If it snows in Tallahasee but in record highs every where else, the average temp is going up.
Global warming does not mean every single point on the globe is warming. It means the average is warming.
- - - Updated - - -
No.
Global warming is a part of climate change.
Putin khuliyo
HolgerDK Stærkodder Shocknorrís
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke.