Hey Kern, why don't you Make an Actual Game Again?
The code for everquest now and everquest 17 years ago is likey the same. They build onto the code where unlike Wow the code is mutated.
Also as for Runescape they literary re-released RS2007 and thats why when you go to play it you start with nothing.
Just because X group can do it does not mean Blizzard can. People need to just accept the fact they said no.
Hell they don't even own the servers anymore they sold those off.
Check me out....Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing, Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing.
My Gaming PC: MSI Trident 3 - i7-10700F - RTX 4060 8GB - 32GB DDR4 - 1TB M.2SSD
Everquest 2 still exists and does progression servers also. Everquest next canceled due to the same reason that Titan is claimed to be canceled. They were doing new and innovative things, but it just wasn't fun.
- - - Updated - - -
Dead is clearly an understatement when the game is still going and expansions are announced and the last response to the game was they look forward to the Future of Everquest. Clearly dead game.
Because reusing a slogan has never been done before. "HURR DURR TRUMP IS HITLER HURR MAKING JOKES IS LIKE HOLOCAUST!"
Also, the only gain Mark would gain from this would be attention, unless he plans on leaving retirement, which I highly doubt.
For all you saying the papers are empty.
https://youtu.be/mFAadmkAd7g
And for christ's sake, paper is recyclable with a minimal loss.
The code is no where near the same. Everquest actually completely redid their engine in an era that this would be more expensive than it is now and with a player base the size of what would probably be on the classic servers. They also claimed the original game didn't exist and every time a new progression server comes around it is more like the actual era the expansion comes out in.
@People who think he didn't actually print it. It sucks that he even had to prove this... Jesus christ, some people.. FailFish
Any proof to this?
Even still how Daybreak handled EQ and how Blizzard handles Wow/Battlenet is two different things. Once again just because X does it does not mean Y can.
Then you have to factor in cost and blizzard clearly thinks it isn't worth it. Don't like the current product stop playing, But accept there answer and move on. Blizzard is not going to make progression servers.
That will open pandora's box anyway. You get classis,next guy wants TBC and another wants wrath or cata. Wow has moved past that point and its best you do as well.
Check me out....Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing, Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing.
My Gaming PC: MSI Trident 3 - i7-10700F - RTX 4060 8GB - 32GB DDR4 - 1TB M.2SSD
And then apple almost went bankrupt, until they brought Steve Jobs back... and he wasn't voted out.
http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/...t-wozniak-says
He also didn't run the company into the ground prior to his departure.
Whereas blizzard's financial position has increased exponentially since Mark Kern left. Red 5 is recovering.
Jobs > Kern
Jobs = innovation, entrepreneur, capitalist
Kern = stagnation, incompetent, socialist
People who have no valid argument attack the speaker instead of the spoken.
Some people grasp at straws to convince themselves WoW is the best it has ever been. Happens in many other situations too. If you don't want legacy servers, that's fine, but why ruin it for the people who want them? If they fail they'll fail. Blizzard won't have to invest but a tiny margin of their profits for a very pro-costumer act that may or may not prove fruitful.
Last edited by Aliadra; 2016-04-26 at 10:59 PM.
And the flip side is people go 'WAAAAH PEOPLE LIKE LIVE WOW AND I DON'T LIKE IT!! WAAAAAAAH!' There are screwups on both sides. People shouldn't be bashed for having the opinion that they want vanilla servers, but they also shouldn't be in the forums posting day in and day out about how bad current wow is and why if you like it you're bad.