That came up in the last new Battlefield thread speculating WW1. Theirs more than just bolt action rifles in WW1 even if they were the vast majority of them.
And since this is a game the Chauchat wouldn't get jammed every 3rd round fired. Trust the French to design a machine gun with an open magazine to be used in a wet muddy crater of a trench so it gets dirt inside immediately.
So WW1 and not 2143... oh joy. My excitement is at an all time high with this one. /s
Oh my, that's a very pretty trailer for the new Battlefield. I like the WW1 setting and the use of elements I have not seen in FPS games previous- mustard gas, prop airplanes, zeppelins, etc.
Looks neat.
So glad they're going this route and not following in CoD's footsteps with all the super futuristic stuff... At least for now.
Battletag(US): Bradski#11752
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you call a tsundere Wookie? Chew-b-b-baka
While im happy and ecstatic to see a world war one game for BF, i just dont think it was a good idea to incorporate this into its next big thing. A spin off would of been good idea like hardline was. But this is what we will be playing for the next 2 years. Makes me wonder how they will keep it fresh for that long.
WWI and WWII had vastly greater varieties of airplanes than we do now simply because they were so much cheaper to design and build at those tech levels.
Riflewise and AFVwise, yes, much more limited, though the tanks were not prototypes and the Brits built hundreds of them. Over six hundred were used in one battle.
Ship variety was pretty wide as well.
If DICE can pull this off then they have to be crowded the champs of FPSs.
They've done:
WW2
Vietnam
Modern
Futuristic
Sci-fi
and now WW1.
Thats impressive.
The way this game turns out will be pretty interesting because I don't see how they could adopt WW1 to the semi-fasted paced combat their fanbase is used to without it just being BF4 in WW1 skins. WW1 didn't have a lot of the equipment players are now used to, even the leap between WW1 and WW2 was pretty large. A lot of it was fought in columns and trenches. Artillery and gas the big boys on their field. Their were no UAVs, drones, ADS, etc. Even Jeeps were uncommon. Bombing runs consisted of pilots throwing grenades out of their planes. This is going to be interesting indeed. Would be funny if they revitalized the WW2 of FPSes.
- - - Updated - - -
Battlefront bombed?
That game is pretty successful
They actively support the game and its not nearly the paid DLC mill that people claimed it to be before it even hit the shelves.
Resident Cosplay Progressive
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
It kinda did in terms of player activity on the PC platform. PS4/XB1 is still doing fine but that's about it. The PC version of Battlefront have about 5-6k concurrent player peaks, currently at about 2,5k, in a multiplayer AAA game that hasn't even been on the market for 6 months. Battlefield 4 regularly sports 6-7 times that number and launched in late 2013.
yes it bombed. Its literally laughed at by any battlefront fan and has a fraction of the population it should considering the popularity that it had when it got announced and its prequals.Battlefront bombed?
That game is pretty successful
They actively support the game and its not nearly the paid DLC mill that people claimed it to be before it even hit the shelves.
I'm happy that someone went for WW1. I would have personally gone for 1943ish but this is more interesting in some regards since it isn't such a safe bet. The best part for me though is that they aren't following the futuristic trend and "OMG WALL RUNNING YEAHHH" that seems to be all the rage right now. It'll be even more interesting if they shoot for a realistic color palette for the world itself rather than the typical darker and washed colors that they try to paint almost every game from an older time period with and generally just try to break away from your typical WW1/2 movie sequences.
Last edited by Erolian; 2016-05-07 at 09:01 AM.
I like it, I've loved Battlefield since the 1942 days which was great. Secrets of WW2 was my shit.
Blizzard White Knighting is not allowed
im a huge WW1 buff so iam really digging this world war 1 setting and i hope they make trench warfare seem as dirty and brutal as it was. Also i like they are adding the Arabian campaign and i expect gallopoli will feature heavily too.
The popularity of its prequels? Battlefront 2 only sold a little over a million copies at launch, with an even split between the PS2/Xbox and a couple hundred thousand more on PSP...
EA Battlefront had sold 13,000,000 copies by January... They haven't reported any figures in the 4 months since then, but I assume the game has continued to sell.
Since when is $800,000,000+ in sales "bombing"?