I find it interesting that liberals always want to restrict my ability to own firearms whenever a criminal misuses their firearms. That would be analogous to restricting my ability to own a hypodermic needle because drug addicts use them to get high. Before you start shouting false equivalence, some numbers......
In 2013 guns were a factor in,
33,636 deaths, over 66% of which were suicides or accidents and undetermined. Only 11,078 firearm related deaths were attributed to homicide.
Conversely, drugs killed:
46,471 people, 17,000 of which were illicit drugs. Heroin alone killed 10,574 people in 2014, only 500 short of firearm homicides the previous year.
http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Caus....HKAeysqw.dpbs
The point is this. Gun violence is way overstated, and the logic towards addressing it is flawed, and not applied universally. I want to give liberals the benefit of the doubt and blame most of their fixation on guns to them simply having an emotional reaction and being frightened by them. While this is silly, as proven by the numbers, at least it isn't nefarious. More and more however I'm becoming convinced that it isn't an emotional reaction and that it is a calculated effort to disarm the citizenry which will remove their primary obstacle to achieving other goals. Those goals being the removal of property rights, freedom of speech, worship and other little inconveniences to their statist utopia. I'm holding out hope for the former though.