Yeah, didn't you know he only said that shit to excite stupid voters? People need to start understanding that not everything stupid Trump says is without reason. He is a douche bag, but he isn't stupid. This is just how populism works. You say things that are popular. If you say things that are popular AND you are not supposed to say them, it excites the people who agree but are too afraid to say them. Elections are about turn out. Trump is trying to build excitement that leads to votes, not to win intellectual arguments on the internet.
It probably helps my family doesn't subscribe to an ugly ideology And save your guilt trip attempt. Anything that disagrees with left wing ideas is "immoral" already, so not like you are saying anything shocking.
The point is if these terrorists know they would put their family at risk, it might have an effect on their decision making. As much as I like to think of terrorists as animals, they are people, and people have exploitable weaknesses. It's easy to say you would sacrifice yourself for a cause. But what about your family?
Someone didn't get the memo that the GOP witch hunt released their findings of the EIGHTH tax payer funded investigation and every single one has cleared Clinton and the administration of wrongdoing. I'm sure you long for the days of a REAL leader, the kind the continues to read The Pet Goat when informed that the largest terrorist attack on American soil had just occurred.
I wonder if the people who say things like "Crooked Hillary" in a completely unironic way realize that it makes them look like complete buffoons. They are actually so dumb that they don't even realize that Trump gives these ridiculous nicknames to his competition because he has realized that pandering to absolute morons is a good way to earn a lot of votes.
I remain convinced that the more Hillary talks, the less her chances of winning, even against Trump.
There's really nothing to support that, especially given that while Hillary is talking, so is Trump, and it appears people react to what Trump says far more negatively.
Ironically enough the best things Trump could probably do for his campaign is just keep his mouth shut for a bit.
I eagerly await the debates. I think Trump can trigger Clinton. Clinton can handle usual political banter, I will give her that, but Trump doesn't fight like your prim and proper politician.
Hillary just isn't likable. She isn't. From what I have seen of Bill, he has a charm to him. Hillary is just so fake, and reeks with pandering. Clinton has her drones, but other than that, nobody is really excited about her. Again, she is political corruption incarnate.
Really?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...nton-5491.html
I don't think so
Fanboy (Fanboi):
1. A term used towards someone when a person disagrees with the said someone on a subject, person, place, thing, company, or product line and they are not smart enough to debate their counterpoints or facts, so they resort to childish name calling in hopes of shaming others into silence and thus them winning through dominance.* 2. A term used as a taunt/peer pressure technique to shape popular opinion through shame and humiliation.
Trump is hit or miss. Sometimes he is very spot on and other times even I face palm. His unpredictability is a strength, but also a weakness. Because when he makes a folly, mainstream media will jump on it faster than anybody else and twist and turn it to the extreme to cover for their Queen and ignorant people eat it up.
Trump's ridiculousness might actually help, oddly enough, in the debates. People almost at this point expect Trump to behave like a neanderthal, but if Trump can get Clinton to snap or pull a "What difference does it make", that would hurt her.
To touch on OP though, I don't think polls can accurately cover this election. This is one that is quite unique.
Fanboy (Fanboi):
1. A term used towards someone when a person disagrees with the said someone on a subject, person, place, thing, company, or product line and they are not smart enough to debate their counterpoints or facts, so they resort to childish name calling in hopes of shaming others into silence and thus them winning through dominance.* 2. A term used as a taunt/peer pressure technique to shape popular opinion through shame and humiliation.