No, it means that the other Alliance leaders confirmed him as High King after his father was dead. Which wasn't uncommon with the High Kingship of Ireland. It wasn't necessarily hereditary, but sons could, and did, succeed fathers.
Further, it's clear that the "High King" doesn't interfere with the internal affairs of member nations. Which is what separates the position from Warchief. When a people joins the Horde they pledge an oath to the Warchief. He or she is their supreme leader in all things. With the High King? He's recognized as the leader of the Alliance and the supreme commander of all of its military forces, but he has no say in the internal affairs of each member nation.
It's a more centralised alliance than you would like, but it's still an alliance. Like the Commonwealth. We all recognize the sovereignty of Elizabeth II, but each of our nations has its own leaders and laws.
Genn is ordered to Stormheim, but he's clearly taking actions into his own hands and going off-script.
I can think of a few reasons other than the position being hereditary.
The first is that Stormwind, even with Varian's death, is still has the strongest military in the Alliance. It makes sense to keep the High Kingship tied to the Crown of Stormwind for the time being.
Secondly? Continuity. Varian didn't pass away during peace time when a council of Alliance leaders and diplomats could have a lengthy discussion about who to succeed Varian as High King. He dies in the middle of a war. Passing the position onto Anduin reassures everyone that the continuity of Alliance leadership remains strong.
On a more RL level...WoW is a product. You need to market it. Going "Horde and Alliance" and "Warchief and High King" is simply more marketable than "Horde and Alliance" and "Warchief and multi-nation bureaucracy headed by a council of delegates." Doesn't exactly inspire, does it?
Lothar was Supreme Commander because of who his daddy was. And who his ancestor was.
Neither of these are legitimate reasons why he would be made a military leader.I can think of a few reasons other than the position being hereditary.
The first is that Stormwind, even with Varian's death, is still has the strongest military in the Alliance. It makes sense to keep the High Kingship tied to the Crown of Stormwind for the time being.
Secondly? Continuity. Varian didn't pass away during peace time when a council of Alliance leaders and diplomats could have a lengthy discussion about who to succeed Varian as High King. He dies in the middle of a war. Passing the position onto Anduin reassures everyone that the continuity of Alliance leadership remains strong.
Alliance was just fine without a high king for years. This is just pointlessly alienating to players that play races other than human.On a more RL level...WoW is a product. You need to market it. Going "Horde and Alliance" and "Warchief and High King" is simply more marketable than "Horde and Alliance" and "Warchief and multi-nation bureaucracy headed by a council of delegates." Doesn't exactly inspire, does it?
Yet, Anduin is the one with the support of the majority of the Alliance throughout WoW, more than his father ever had. He studied with Bolvar, he spent time in Ironforge as a student of the Light and a diplomat, he became apprentice of Velen and led diplomatic actions in Pandaria.
It's not because "Varian's son", far from it. If there is hereditary works here is the fact that he was the heir of the Stormwind Armed Forces.
Stormwind being the most powerful nation in the Alliance would indicate otherwise.
Anyway he seems to have delegated the job of military leadership to Genn.
In story or out of story?Alliance was just fine without a high king for years.
In story the Alliance was directionless until Varian returned. Out of story? Even back before the High King thing was made official? The marketing from WotLK revolved around Thrall and Vairan, and then Garrosh and Varian. The "High King" stuff just canonized what the marketing team had been doing for years.
Anyway I'm done with this. You're not even replying to arguments, just repeating the same thing over and over. And I've let you drag me into an argument that's taking away from a discussion about a pretty cool comic.
That's the problem you see. You don't like the High King idea? Ok, everyone has something in the lore they don't like. It's only a problem when you don't let it go and try to make it dominate every discussion where it could possibly fit, like you're doing. Have a good one.