Your posts are there for all to see. Unless you meant something else by them, most people will take the point that I took.
Of course we wouldn't. Not all Muslims are Islamist extremists. Thankfully most of the religious discard their holy books. The ones who don't however (e.g. the Islamic extremists) aren't doing to out of a zealous love of secular values, are they?
I have never claimed this. I will never get this mindset. If I criticise the role of Islam in Islamist extremism (why do you think it is called Islamist and not...something else?), I am calling all Muslims extremists? The leap you have taken is too much, and if I didn't know better, I would say it is a deliberate leap in order to try and prevent criticism, born out of white guilt. I don't know you well enough to speculate on that point, however.
You imply that all extremists are mentally weak, or even ill. And being mislead by some group for reasons that have nothing to do with religion.
Religion is not Islam. Islam is a religion. There are other religions, at no point have I suggested that there is only one religion and it's name is Islam (despite what some followers might say). We would be talking more about Christianity, if it were the Christians extremists blowing themselves up in crowded places, or the Judaism, if it was the Jewish extremists that were blowing themselves up in crowded places. It isn't. They don't because they ultimately lost their power, they were forced to curb the worst in their books and adopt more secular values. Islam, in Islamic countries, haven't really had this. Islam is not being picked on just because most of its adherents aren't white.
Waco....yea, that atheist retreat that got roughed up by popo for being too atheist.
Those two guys were the worst. They were raised and educated in a world where this type of behavior is not accepted, thus the fact that they committed this atrocity is MILES worse than those poor 450 Muslims that knew no better.
So my suggestion is to teach the likes of those two to not commit Terrorist attacks.
All the places muslims conquered from christian and other hands from around year 700 that are now a majority muslim population is doing so well these days, africa and the middleeast such wonderful places with so much to offer.
Both controlling territory and being recognized as government of that territory are necessary to be recognized as a state.
E.g. one of the reasons Palestine isn't recognized by many other nation is that it doesn't control its territory; and Israel is still seen as an occupier with no legitimate control of its territory by many states. Thus "statehood" is not an objective measure - but something that other states use depending on their diplomatic and military goals.
Yes, the followers all are.
Yes, again. That's what I am saying.And being mislead by some group for reasons that have nothing to do with religion.
The religion only serves as the tool to the bidding of the few leaders.
Fine, then you should know that we're talking about 76 dead people, and a bunch more alive and arrested. And all just because of one single lunatic who was charismatic enough to for some reason make nearly 100 people believe in, and follow him.Waco....yea, that atheist retreat that got roughed up by popo for being too atheist.
Of course, it seems at the first glance as some different thing.
But it isn't. It's still the same human brain. Still the same chemical processes that causing these things.
And, for the record now.
We've probably the 234578th thread about the issue, and once again it's nothing else than "Islam is bad", it's the Muslim's fault.
No one really ever, or at least not enough, is interested in looking into those whole arrays of other reasons.
Sorry, not how I roll.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
Then you admit that religion isn't a good thing? You seem to imply that religion is fine, then go on to list all of the bad things that it leads people to, but seem to let it off the hook for being a mere tool.
- - - Updated - - -
No, it didn't. These people weren't desperate. They were well educated and middle class. It isn't simply desperate people who sign onto this kind of shit.
if you replace the word "muslims" with extremists, what does the number of suicide attacks change to?
Hi
Most people who opt to kill themselves are quite desperate. There's a clear trend when it comes to the majority of "martyrs." They tend to be young males, often those without a solid career or love life. Hell, the same can be said for most of the people who enlist in the military in America.