Maybe they don't have the luxury of choice, the knowledge on which countries the would find it easiest to make new lives for themselves, maybe they're not welcome in some of these countries, and maybe they don't know anything about western culture before they're already among us. It's not that simple.
Mother pus bucket!
ofcourse there is...you find that hard to believe? you hear about only the 'worst(in eyes of media) and only attacks on western populations.
acts of terror are alot more than just someone commiting suicide with a bomb strapped to them or shooting groups of people.
people are confusing niqabs with hijabs. they are not the same.
check the daily occurance of radical islamic terror in the middle east and africa. it is a daily occurrence now and has been for some time.
The issue is the justification behind the ban. If a school wants to limit something because it conceals their face in a classroom, that makes logical sense. If the justification is to ban it because Muslims are scary, then that is idiocy. That's the territory that the OP jumped into by preaching to also ban hijabs.
And you go on and site some of the oppressive stuff that goes on under highly Islamic cultures to somehow prove a point. Totally forgetting the bit where if you would go there and go against things like veiled woman or any of the other drivel, you would most likely be slapped silly or end up in jail.
Now, apparently your point is "but it is not easy for them", and im sorry to be the one to have to inform you, life is not fucking easy. Yes, it sucks to be them, but that is no reason to upset the culture you had to flee to. If the option is "to starve, suffer and die" as you have put it, or, not being able to wear all covering cloths in your new country i'd say that is a pretty low price to pay for not dying and all that jazz.
And yes, that stance does defend FGM, as you know, why should they have to adhere to this pesky local culture? They are free to do whatever they want, so why not this then? This maybe where you draw the line, but it is arbitrary at best.
Hijab is fine it looks great, im not sure why anyone would wear the blue burqa though, looks like a personal prison and i doubt any woman likes wearing it. The niqab is abit to much also but im ok with it. It also looks like that culture went backwards after the clothing the old persian, egyptian etc women wore back then.
Last edited by ParanoiD84; 2016-08-23 at 12:12 PM.
Wait if people practicing their culture and not harming you, is "upsetting your culture" then your culture is pretty shit. If your culture is "assimilate else I'll be upset." it's utter shit.
- - - Updated - - -
Really? Western Civilization is essentially Europe...
Christians wear niquab ? that's new. For the record: habit of of nuns are not a fine example as they wont conceal their faces.
and if you did catch a nasty cold and use a scarf: dont visit a bank headwrapped; security trumps your health anytime. Or simple remove it for a nice shot of the camera.
It is when these clothings cover your face, in our culture we expect to see peoples faces, it is that simple. This is an unwritten rule that can be applied throughout western culture. So it is not against Muslims, but rather a culture clash. And you might find it silly, but when you go somewhere you adhere to their culture, not doing this is plainly rude.
It's my personal belief that Muslims who are living in non-muslim nations have an acceptable compromise available to them; the hijab.
While I understand that the niqab is important to some, completely covering your face isn't really acceptable practice in public no matter the garment.
Wow i did not think anyone in Germany had it in them, way to go.
This protection of religion for any costs for security risks have gone too far. If you dont like western culture or want to pratice your religion?
Go to places where you can, it is as simple as that. All they want is both and free social security in most cases.