Clinton needs a double digit lead before heading into Labor Day, because historically Clinton has a hard time holding leads when she has to do press conferences, debates, and interviews as an election time nears.
Clinton needs a double digit lead before heading into Labor Day, because historically Clinton has a hard time holding leads when she has to do press conferences, debates, and interviews as an election time nears.
a) I'm not black, I'm caucasian
b) Welcome to my ignore list (why I never did this with somebody like you, who openly supports White Supremacy on these forums, I have no idea)
c) they're not "neck and neck" in polls... Hillary has a stupidly huge lead on Dump.
d) Hillary has stadiums full of people supporting her as well... so stop lying as if she doesn't have that support.
and finally
e) Why did you specifically target me in both the threads? tired of me pointing out how you previously supported White-Supremacy? Well, here it is - once again down below you on these forums supporting white supremacy... and again, welcome to my ignore list.
I expected better from the epilepsy society.
http://epilepsyontario.org/about-epi...ence-seizures/ (I know adults with this)
Sadly there was no video for CFS, but I think it explains it better
http://epilepsyontario.org/about-epi...onic-seizures/
Non nobis Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam
Eat yo vegetables
LOL stupid huge lead in the polls? LOL
http://www.aol.com/article/2016/08/2...sies/21460390/
Non nobis Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam
The existence of Clinton paid internet trolls was proven in the Leaked emails fro Wikileaks.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/4...nternet-Trolls
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-n...htmlstory.html
http://reverbpress.com/politics/batt...ernie-sanders/
Last edited by Dystemper; 2016-08-29 at 02:26 PM.
Non nobis Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam
Unlike, Trump, I don't know of one verifiable case where Hillary has paid supporters, to support her. On the other hand Trump had to pay a room full of people to show up for his announcement that he was going to run. So, which one has the history of paying supporters money to support them again?
More ammo for trump, Huma is now a big liability for Clinton
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...second-chance/
- - - Updated - - -
I posted the link verifying that Clinton has paid trolls.
Non nobis Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam
A pro-Clinton PAC paying trolls, to troll individuals, is NOT paying or buying supporters. Nice try though.
And what does Anthony being a sleaze-bag again have to do with his wife? Trump cheated on both his wives at minimum, and somehow he's not a liability. It's a non-issue for Huma working with Hillary.
So people you dont agree with are "mongrels" and you ignore those who question you. How terribly enlightened of you. So very tolerant.
- - - Updated - - -
On Sunday night, the New York Post reported that Weiner had recently been sexting with a woman who is not his wife. Making the story even more cringe-worthy, the New York Post reports that Weiner sent a suggestive photo of himself while his toddler son was in the bed next to him.
Weiner didn't deny any of this. He told the New York Post that he and the woman “have been friends for some time.”
“She has asked me not to comment except to say that our conversations were private, often included pictures of her nieces and nephews and my son and were always appropriate,” he said.
The irony here is that Weiner had finally appeared to be cleaning up his soiled public reputation.
_____________________________________
so you dont think women will not find this pretty bad that Huma's husband was taking suggestive pictures to send to another woman while their toddler was in bed next to him. That can be grounds to have thechild removed from the home or a investigation into it if Huma does not remove the kid and herself from that house.
Last edited by Dystemper; 2016-08-29 at 02:45 PM.
Non nobis Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam
Yes, but Anthony Weiner, still sexting, has nothing at all to do with his wife. It certainly doesn't give Trump "ammo" against Huma and especially not Hillary. If anything people who even know who Huma is, would probably look at her more in a favorable light as a victim, to behaviors like those of, Bill, Anthony, and Trump.
***Edit***
It shows poor judgement and obviously isn't appropriate, but certainly wouldn't constitute her, having to flee, her home with their children. He wasn't nude, there is no child endangerment, and for all you know Huma might be seeking a divorce lawyer as we speak, but that's not relevant to Hillary's campaign, or Huma's public image.so you dont think women will not find this pretty bad that Huma's husband was taking suggestive pictures to send to another woman while their toddler was in bed next to him. That can be grounds to have thechild removed from the home or a investigation into it if Huma does not remove the kid and herself from that house.
Last edited by -Nurot; 2016-08-29 at 02:55 PM.
Has Trump or Ivanka ever cooked? Period? For any of the children? If that's ammo, then wow, he's in bad shape. The blinders are real.
***Edit***
Not to mention Trump rarely saw the kids, from all accounts the nannies and the grandparents raised Eric, Donald Junior and Ivanka, before they were each shipped off to boarding school.
Ah yes, boarding school, the easy way out for lazy parents who don't want to parent.
Last edited by -Nurot; 2016-08-29 at 03:09 PM.