Yes, I can.
What I mean is when people - and there are examples in this thread - post logs and refer to specific parts about those logs (for instance, overall damage done on Heroic Xavius while purposely overlooking the tentacle cheese damage.. or using damage done in the heart phase as a reason why Warlock's aren't good on Il'Gynoth, etc) while ignoring the relevance of them in the actual encounter. Looking at logs and deciphering the information is one thing, looking at them and only focusing on the rankings is another. And the majority of people do the latter.
People are ALSO looking at top team's logs and then comparing them to their own, even though they are not top players playing in top groups, and using that as an excuse as to why they aren't or can't do well.
Define "many other classes." There are only a couple of classes completely outshining warlocks. The rest, we can definitely be neck and neck with when it comes to relevant damage. Does that mean we have to be as good as everyone on single target while maintaining our cleave? No. Does that mean we have to be beating every class? No. But we can absolutely be doing good enough damage to be a factor in the fights.Are warlocks unplayable? Ofcourse not, but it seems to be a baldfaced lie to pretend they're even remotely as good as many other classes right now when they're beat on ST, beat on their niche fights - beat on just about anything unless you're playing at a better level than your guildmates, but you refuse to accept that as a reason for why you might anecdotally be doing well in your guild because you perceive it as an insult to them.
It was predicted before the raid, it's been supported by the results from raids and it's supported by Blizzard themselves by the look of it - they're not throwing out blanket buffs to the spec because they think it's doing fine, what more do you want?
That does not mean that we don't need tuning, or better mechanics. But that also doesn't mean people should be crybabies about it or insult people and their groups when a Warlock thinks he can and is doing well.
- - - Updated - - -
LOL. You're kidding, right? What +difficulty can you not clear with those numbers? What have you even completed in this expansion? And if we're talking Mythic+ what the fuck does it matter if you can keep up with mages and hunters (you know, two of the strongest specs in the game that most other classes also can't keep up with, and keep in mind this is ONE spec of mage and ONE spec of hunter.) if you're all collectively clearing the Mythic+ difficulty on time?
I am genuinely curious about your groups though, because I've noticed you post about how "serious" they are a couple of times as well as cited you "participating in raids." What are your accomplishments thus far?
If you can't ST burst past 400k as a Warlock - Destro or Demo - that's a L2P issue.When fire mages and hunters are bursting 400k to even 500k ST
I play with people that have multiple top 100 world rankings. Warlocks are a lot more capable than you say they are. They need work and tuning - which we will be getting - but the type of garbage you are spreading is the reason Warlocks look so bad and have a hard time getting into groups.Because you haven't played with players that are good at those classes does not mean that it's okay for warlocks to be capped at mediocrity and forced to choose between whether we're able to pull ST or AoE.