How do you know this without verifiable empirical evidence? Seriously, it's only fake if it's proven to be fake (or we can't verify the information).. All he has to do (instead of ramble about it) is just say, NO THIS INFORMATION IS FALSE. He didn't do that, so he;s making it worse.
The FBI was in a total fucking civil war over Trump vs Clinton and Comey ended up being an ace in the sleeve of the GOP. To say the FBI hates Trump is laughable.
The others? Yeah. That's also what happens when you discredit the entire intelligence agency while supporting Pizzagate, Julian Assange, Infowars, and RT as sources of valid news.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/tr...alings-n705586"Intel and law enforcement officials agree that none of the investigations have found any conclusive or direct link between Trump and the Russian government period," the senior official said.
According to the senior official, the two-page summary about the unsubstantiated material made available to the briefers was to provide context, should they need it, to draw the distinction for Trump between analyzed intelligence and unvetted "disinformation."
NBC have confirmed with FBI/CIA officals that it was fake news.
This woman has spoken for the majority of the time.
latest news is that the russians have seen what's under his wig
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..
Active WoW player Jan 2006 - Aug 2020
Occasional WoW Classic Andy since.
Nothing lasts forever, as they say.
But at least I can casually play Classic and remember when MMORPGs were good.
So is Trump gonna self destruct America by making all their trading partners trade with China or other people?
That also doesn't mean it's fake. It was just dropped before it could be verified.
People should absolutely be skeptical of its legitimacy, but that doesn't mean write it off as "nope fake news scrolling by."
- - - Updated - - -
If that's all you can add to a conversation by calling someone a troll who disagrees with you, enjoy your report and skipping over your shit. Encourage everyone else to no longer feed it.
No, dems and SJW believed all the others. That's a bullshit assertion that has no basis in reality. He is now president, his ethics are now a much bigger deal. When you are president, the magnifying glass gets bigger not smaller.
I know you seem to think this is somehow a new thing that Dems or SJW. Try seeing the fact that he is the first president in 50+ years to not release his tax returns and assertions that it's due to foreign debt. In 2010, Russian spies were kicked out of US for trying to influence US politicians. Trump questioning the meaning of a relationship, when asked what he meant by having a relationship with Putin. Manafold's release due to a scandal of his Russian ties. The appointment of an Exxon CEO, with long history of trade deals with Russia. Even what at least should seem as a bad joke at this point, in Trump asking Russian hackers to do it.
A release that Russia has something on Trump, isn't something SJW or Dems cling to. It just ties everything into a nice tight bun.
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi