Buzzfeed who broke the story on the documents wrote in the original article that, "The allegations are unverified, and the report contains errors." <Taken directly from the orginal Buzzfeed article. I Just Watched Chuck Todd's interview with the Buzzfeed’s Editor in Chief Ben Smith and he admits that the document were full problems. He goes on to say that he feels its up to the reader to decide whats true vs fake so yes this is FAKE NEWS with no substantiated proof to the documents and this thread should be locked.
Oh god Carl Bernstein. After the whole "fake news!" escalation and Conway trying to blast Cooper and backfiring, apparently he had enough and outed her as one of the anonymous sources pouring information and leaks to the media.
This just gets juicier.
I never said I "only seek the truth". Why are you attributing things I didn't say to me, with quotes even? What I said was, the POINT OF JOURNALISM is to seek the truth. I never claimed to be a journalist; I am in fact a shameless hack, albeit a slightly independent one (because the issues don't align for me, not that I am so above being partisan).
http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...ging-lobbyists
http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...next-President
http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...nt-in-CA/page2
http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...ne-for-a-While
That's just the threads you started. There's a clear bias, even if you don't want to admit to one. There's countless others that are anti-liberal and anti-Democrat. Once again, there's nothing wrong with being against those types, but it does show who you are.
http://mediamatters.org/video/2017/0...inister/214989
No idea if that website itself is reputable but it's a video of a CNN segment. Jump to about 4 minutes. He claims that Kellyanne has been an anonymous source to the MSM for a long time, including the last 10 months while on Trump's team.
Bernstein NEVER outs his sources as it's a good way to get people to not deliver them to you. But the attack on the media, "fake news," and trying to discredit anyone who disagrees with him is a really big fucking deal by Trump.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid..._minister.html
He's not claiming she's the source of these leaks, or leaks that are damaging to Trump.
Campaign officials or members of the administration "leaking" information to media is not new or unique here. It's a longstanding practice on the part of politicians to try to use media to their benefit.
He makes no connection between her and any of the current crop of leaks, or that she is one of his anonymous sources.
He's decrying how media can be, and are, manipulated by politicians in general.
Sure, but he has no credibility with Trumpsters, only Trump has credibility to them (and his surrogates). I was mainly clarifying for others in this thread who may have read to much into your post : P
I suppose her being an anonymous source is news for folks who haven't followed politics for a while, but for the rest of us it's pretty routine info. Of course the Trump campaign is leaking information to press, and doing so anonymously rather than on the record. Hillary's folks did it do. Obama's people did it. The next crop of campaigns will do it, the next president will do it etc. Sadly though, Trumpsters will largely continue to ignore reality for the sake of the fantasy that Trump has created and continues to try to convince people is real.